 | i am glad i dont have to pay for caps like time warner that is ridiculous i easy can view up to thousands on top of thousands of pictures with fios. sure i dont have time warner but it just stating this is purely ridiculous. and when i had only 768k dsl i was still going through 1gb a day without any kind of downloads. i am glad fios has yet to cap their service as long as you pay them they dont care. -- Member of FIOS tech forum. |
|
 1 edit | Caps are a way to force user to pay more if they use certain amount of data Caps are a way to generate more revenue without any investment Caps let the company run to the bank a lot more frequent then they normally do Caps allows the company to make more money while the employee doesn't get a raise.
With caps in place, they will be able to oversubsribe and not cost them a penny... All it takes is that more people subscribe to this lousy service and everyone use a lot less bandwidth so that their network is rarely used.
Capitalism - wealth centralised into the few hands, everyone work for money and are poorly paid, in debt and are broke for life. Poverty is as a bad as communism Communism - wealth centralised into the few hands, everyone works for free and are not compensated for their hardwork. Everyone gets their meager share and are living in poverty. It doesn't matter what system. be it socialism... when the few controls everything we are all screwed.
Amen. |
|
 fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | With caps in place, it will allow them to manage their networks from those that go above and beyond their rights to abuse the resources.
With caps in place, it will allow them to grow at a reasonable pace while demands on the internet outpace their ability to rebuild and reinvest.
You have no idea of what being "poorly paid" is until you go to ares of the world where people are poorly paid.
This is the only country where the average home has 2 or more televisions. This is the only country where more people live in actual houses. While you bash capitalism, you fail to see how you benefit from it.
You do two things wrong:
1) You bash capitalism, yet you offer no solution. You apparently love to bash things and bitch but you offer no solution.
2) You failed to say WHICH system WOULD be fair and better suited for you... (hint: just about every one system out there takes more from people to give people who don't want to contribute their money.
When was the last time you voted correctly? When was the last time you voted for a candidate that would best represent the country and not a niche issue? Truth is most people vote for dem or pub. This system can work right if the right people are put in place to manage it. |
|
|
|
 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Yarmouth Port, MA kudos:5 | said by fiberguy:With caps in place, it will allow them to manage their networks from those that go above and beyond their rights to abuse the resources. Just how did we get from 250 hosts to over 500 MILLION before Deep Packet Inspection and Usage Caps came along? -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon HTTP is the new Bandwidth Hog...
|
|
 fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | Really??
How did we get from a few people using cell phones and no cell phone related accidents back in the late 80s / early 90s to cell phone legislation banning the use of them in cars?
Ever heard of what the idiots of the masses do to something good? Remember Mr YouTube whiner who tried to come here and tell his story of how comcast booted him claiming he didn't over use the internet, and then told us how he did?
It's always that the few end up spoiling it for the max. Sadly, some of those few are right here on BBR. |
|