<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: tuning times? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20736418</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:36:14 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:36:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20739576</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/121095"><b>RARPSL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hobgoblin <A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The last test results I saw was this<br><br>In a 30 second period the tester was able to tune to 25 channels in a non SDV enviroment<br><br>In a 30 second period the tester was able to tune to 24 Channels in an SDV Enviroment.<br><br>I am sure people will moan about that.<br><br>Hob<br> </div>Which 24 channels? If all/most of them were ones that were ALREADY being feed to that node, all you are actually measuring is the time that is needed to do the handshake that says "Add me to your feed list of channels you ALREADY are feeding". The only way that measurement is valid is if all (or at least most) of the requested channels are NOT currently available on the node. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20739576</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:51:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20738795</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1118186"><b>cypherstream</b></A> : Here's a video of the channel up button lagging horribly on my DVR.<br><br><A HREF="http://home.comcast.net/~cypherx/comcastlag.avi">Click to download</a>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20738795</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:29:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20737029</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1118186"><b>cypherstream</b></A> : There should be something in the diagnostics menu.  For Motorola power off and quickly push OK/Select.  Check if there are any SDV code modules or special diagnostics that would lead you to think SDV is installed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20737029</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:23:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20737013</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1118186"><b>cypherstream</b></A> : Wow even 24 channels in an SDV environment within 30 seconds would be a godsend here.  I'm lucky if I can get through 8 channels on the DVR within 30 seconds before it freezes up and stops accepting a channel change command.<br><br>Motorola DCT-6412 running I-Guide sucks.  The performance is so shitty you can't even channel surf in the conventional way.  You have to point and select stuff out of the guide.  No linear Ch Up/Down for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20737013</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:21:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736958</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1530301"><b>Corydon</b></A> : I'm in Denver, and I honestly have no clue whether I'm part of this trial or not.  I suspect that I am.<br><br>Actually, that brings up a point...anyone know how to find out if you are part of an SDV trial or not?  Would they tell you if the end result is supposed to be invisible?<br><br>I've noticed zero change in how my TV performs.<br><small>--<br>"Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736958</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:12:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736600</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1487606"><b>xenophon</b></A> : My TWC SDV switches channels at the same speed as non-SDV.  Don't notice any difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736600</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:58:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736562</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/807511"><b>andyross</b></A> : DVR's often add an additional lag due to buffering. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736562</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:49:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736513</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1419642"><b>neufuse</b></A> : must be some fast tuners there... because on digital alone with no SDV our SA8300HD boxes can take up to 2 seconds to turn a channel.... I can't imagin a SDV video with a reolving channel carosuel would be faster here... one of the techs that as out a couple weeks ago told me "it could take up to 5 seconds on SA systems to tune a SDV channel"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736513</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:34:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Remind me to NEVER work for you!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1466475"><b>FLengineer</b></A> : Analog tuning time will depend on the device that is actually being tuned. TV's are NOT created equal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736473</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:27:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Remind me to NEVER work for you!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736420</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : What about SDV vs Analog?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736420</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:18:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736418</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><b>hobgoblin</b></A> : The last test results I saw was this<br><br>In a 30 second period the tester was able to tune to 25 channels in a non SDV enviroment<br><br>In a 30 second period the tester was able to tune to 24 Channels in an SDV Enviroment.<br><br>I am sure people will moan about that.<br><br>Hob<br><small>--<br>"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." <br>- Ralph Waldo Emerson <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736418</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:18:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>tuning times?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736359</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/971611"><b>Paulg</b></A> : How does the time the channel takes to tune compare to a non-SDV environment?<br><small>--<br>I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20736359</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:07:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
