<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection in Cisco</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20743686</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:56:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:56:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20747997</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1562103"><b>smeegs</b></A> : I just tried an 837 and no luck with that either.<br><br>I apply the policy to the PVC and it's in the running config, but then I do a sh policy-map int at0 vc 8/35 and it says no policy applied.<br><br>The really strange this is when I do a sh run again, the service-policy line is gone  :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20747997</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:03:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20743686</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1562103"><b>smeegs</b></A> : Thanks aryoba,<br><br>I am aware of what I can and can't achieve, the problem is the policy-map not actually applying to the PVC.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20743686</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:40:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20741338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676954"><b>aryoba</b></A> : Did you check out this forum FAQ before posting?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/cisco">Cisco Forum FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/14162">Router runs VoIP, Bit Torrent, Online Gaming;  DynDNS - QoS Sample Configuration</A><br><br>Note that the traffic shaping implementation helps when congestion occurs within your network (the network you have control over). When the congestion occurs outside your network (i.e. the ISP network), then there is pretty much nothing you can do unless your ISP is willing to implement similar traffic shaping implementation to their network to match your configuration (which I doubt they will do).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20741338</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:00:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20738744</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1562103"><b>smeegs</b></A> : Thanks,<br><br>I tried applying the policy on the PVC and when I do a sh policy it just returns a blank line.  I think I will just use a MODEM and apply the policy on an ethernet interface.<br><br>I can't find the link now, but I was reading on Cisco's site and got the impression from one of their articles that the ADSL WIC itself may not support CBWFQ.  Although I thought all hardware queues were FIFO and the scheduler that will achieve CBWFQ is all software anyway.  I don't know...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20738744</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:17:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20717352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1467521"><b>ciscoiphead</b></A> : .]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20717352</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:28:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20715484</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1130617"><b>deepblackmag</b></A> : Abandon all hope.<br><br>I spent (read: wasted) an epic amount of time trying to get low latency queueing working on the wic-1adsl.<br><br>Long story short (search for one of my previous threads in this forum for some interesting cisco output and debugging details) it was a tremendous failure. The virtual interfaces such as the dialer or virtual access would never experience a state of congestion (thus never prioritize) and sticking the service policy on the ATM PVC seemed to yeild no significant results. Also managed to somehow configure the service-policy and VBR-NRT settings in such a way that when the upstream was indeed congested, the router would start droping keepalives and LCP would flap lol. Oh fun times with cisco routers.<br><br>Nested shaping turned out to be impossible as well on adsl, and some of the error messages still have me trying to figure out what they mean: Inconsistent qid (3946070) found in AVL for service policy 0x86789618<br><br>TL;DR use an external DSL modem and set the service policy on an ethernet interface where it might actually do some good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20715484</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 09:06:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20715217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1467521"><b>ciscoiphead</b></A> : The best place is on the physical ATM interface:<br><br>interface ATM0/0/0<br> no ip address<br> load-interval 30<br> no atm ilmi-keepalive<br> dsl operating-mode itu-dmt<br> dsl enable-training-log<br> pvc 0/35<br>  vbr-nrt 448 448 1<br>  tx-ring-limit 3<br>  encapsulation aal5snap<br>  service-policy output V3PN<br>  pppoe-client dial-pool-number 1<br><br>#sh queueing interface atM 0/0/0<br>  Interface ATM0/0/0 VC 0/35<br>  Queueing strategy: weighted fair<br>  Output queue: 0/512/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)<br>     Conversations  0/4/32 (active/max active/max total)<br>     Reserved Conversations 2/2 (allocated/max allocated)<br>     Available Bandwidth 22 kilobits/sec]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20715217</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:52:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Config] CBWFQ for PPPoA connection</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20712469</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1562103"><b>smeegs</b></A> : Hi guys,<br><br>I'm stuck on a bit of config for my home router at the moment. I have a 1721 with an ADSL WIC running 12.4(19) and I am trying to apply CBWFQ for the internet bound queue.<br><br>I have successfully applied the same policies to a lab using serial interfaces, so my class and policy maps are fine.<br><br>From reading around, I think the problem is with the Virtual-Access interface not picking up the CBWFQ strategy from the Dialer interface (the VA according to Cisco is where the queueing will occur), and it's still reading 'fifo'.  I can't figure out how to apply the queueing strategy to the VA.  I got the feeling from one post that for PPPoA I may need to use a multilink interface, and from another that a simple shut/no shut fixed the problem...  I even tried a reboot just for kicks.<br><br>I don't know if this is related or not either, but I'm also getting zero conversation count for a 'sh qu d1' which I'm pretty sure shouldn't be zero.<br><br>Relevant output is included below;<br><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>interface Dialer1&#012; description ...&#012; bandwidth 896&#012; bandwidth receive 5120&#012; ip address negotiated&#012; ip nat outside&#012; ip virtual-reassembly&#012; encapsulation ppp&#012; dialer pool 1&#012; ppp authentication chap callin&#012; ppp chap hostname ...&#012; ppp chap password ...&#012; service-policy output di1-outbound&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>Dialer1 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)&#012;  Hardware is Unknown&#012;  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 896 Kbit, RxBW 5120 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,&#012;     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255&#012;  Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set&#012;  Keepalive set (10 sec)&#012;  DTR is pulsed for 1 seconds on reset&#012;  Interface is bound to Vi2&#012;  Last input never, output never, output hang never&#012;  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:31:41&#012;  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0&#012;  Queueing strategy: Class-based queueing&#012;  Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)&#012;     Conversations  0/0/256 (active/max active/max total)&#012;     Reserved Conversations 2/2 (allocated/max allocated)&#012;     Available Bandwidth 448 kilobits/sec&#012;  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec&#012;  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec&#012;     80499 packets input, 9770453 bytes&#012;     186567 packets output, 241714484 bytes&#012;Bound to:&#012;Virtual-Access2 is up, line protocol is up&#012;  Hardware is Virtual Access interface&#012;  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 896 Kbit, DLY 20000 usec,&#012;     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255&#012;  Encapsulation PPP, LCP Open&#012;  Listen: CDPCP&#012;  Open: IPCP&#012;  PPPoATM vaccess, cloned from Dialer1&#012;  Vaccess status 0x44&#012;  Bound to ATM0 VCD: 1, VPI: 8, VCI: 35, loopback not set&#012;  Keepalive set (10 sec)&#012;  DTR is pulsed for 5 seconds on reset&#012;  Interface is bound to Di1 (Encapsulation PPP)&#012;  Last input 00:00:02, output never, output hang never&#012;  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 01:30:26&#012;  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0&#012;  Queueing strategy: fifo&#012;  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)&#012;  5 minute input rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec&#012;  5 minute output rate 1000 bits/sec, 1 packets/sec&#012;     80555 packets input, 9772952 bytes, 0 no buffer&#012;     Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles&#012;     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort&#012;     186605 packets output, 241715770 bytes, 0 underruns&#012;     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets&#012;     0 unknown protocol drops&#012;     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out&#012;     0 carrier transitions&#012;</textarea><!--end code block--><br>A snapshot of 'sh policy-map int d1'<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>    Class-map: browsing (match-any)&#012;      7061 packets, 9869202 bytes&#012;      5 minute offered rate 215000 bps, drop rate 0 bps&#012;      Match: protocol http&#012;        7061 packets, 9869202 bytes&#012;        5 minute rate 215000 bps&#012;      Match: protocol secure-http&#012;        0 packets, 0 bytes&#012;        5 minute rate 0 bps&#012;      Queueing&#012;        Output Queue: Conversation 265&#012;        Bandwidth remaining 25 (%)&#012;        (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0&#012;        (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0&#012;         exponential weight: 9&#012;         mean queue depth: 0&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20712469</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:10:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
