Mactron
el camino Real
Premium
join:2001-12-16
CM94sv
| reply to amigo_boy
Re: Nice
said by amigo_boy  :Just use the other frequencies that aren't affected by BPL. Mark Your many Anti Ham, BPL Cheerleader Biased posts here precede you. No response required. 
Why don't don't YOU go use another means of communication other than the Internet...
--
If only the Verizon CSRs worked this well. |
|
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
 ·Cox HSI
 ·magicjack.com
4 edits | said by Mactron :Your many Anti Ham, BPL Cheerleader Biased posts here precede you. No response required. FYI. I'm not pro-BPL. Just not buying the sales job radio hobbyists would like everyone to accept, unchallenged. Hobby radio may serve a valuable purpose. Maybe more should be expected from it. Maybe everyone can get by with FRS and CBRS.
Everything should be on the table. And, question everything. Especially those with a vested interest in the position they want everyone else to accept.
This is about the time someone will say "but it's an international treaty, so you'll have to change that. Until then, leave us alone." Ok. But, like the argument that HF is used by the government (therefore, radio hobbyists are deriving a coattail protection from interference), why go into all the self-ingratiating backslapping about serving a public service? Just say it's protected by an international treaty? Why the sales job? If you're going to put on lipstick, cover blemishes and wear a push-up bra, expect someone to ask questions. 
Mark |
|
rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04
USA
| said by amigo_boy :said by Mactron :Your many Anti Ham, BPL Cheerleader Biased posts here precede you. No response required. FYI. I'm not pro-BPL. Just not buying the sales job radio hobbyists would like everyone to accept, unchallenged. Hobby radio may serve a valuable purpose. Maybe more should be expected from it. Maybe everyone can get by with FRS and CBRS. You're anti-ham and anti-fact, history has proven that. We've been down the same road again and again arguing with you, so it's no use debating with you leading statements like "maybe everyone can get by with FRS and CBRS". You rarely back up what you say and when you do it's usually your own made up "facts". |
|
