Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T Southeast » [Availability] Distance Limits?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
411
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Anyone else losing sync - weekends? »
« [Services] AT&T Wi-Fi  
AuthorAll Replies


ycool

join:2001-12-04
Miami, FL


edit:
July 6th, @11:57AM

 [Availability] Distance Limits?

I got the following distance limits out of AT&T Yahoo faq, Are these the same for Bellsouth?
-----------------
1.5meg
CO = 14kf
RT = 18.5kf
-----------------
3meg
CO = 9kf
RT = 12.5kf
-----------------
6meg
CO = 6.5kf
RT = 8.5kf
-----------------
I believe 3meg gets sold up to 12.5k from CO, and 1.5meg up to 18k and lite up to 24k. I'm I wrong?

Can someone please post current distance limits for speed tiers?


logic1977
Premium
join:2001-02-11
Tucker, GA
What difference does it make?

FAQFixer
Premium
join:2004-06-28
Powder Springs, GA

edit:
July 8th, @09:38AM

reply to ycool
The differences in distance for service offered by a CO based DSLAM compared to an RT base is interesting.


logic1977
Premium
join:2001-02-11
Tucker, GA
reply to ycool
Yes I agree it is interesting. But would you believe me when I say that the RT doesn't have a longer loop limit?


wayjac
Premium
join:2001-12-22
Indy
reply to ycool
DSL Extreme 6.0
6.5kf

DSL Extreme
13.0 kf

Ultra
18kf


Gflash

@bellsouth.net

 reply to ycool
there is no difference whatever in the equipment between the c.o. or the dslam they are exactly the same . the outer limits on adsl are as follows.... 1.5 meg = 24k ft 3 meg = 18k ft 6 meg = 9k ft . Your remote co will not be over 5 k from you if it is near the cross box Various company policies will sometimes limit this to be "on the safe side " All this needless speculation in the absence of real facts! Remember -- 1. cable line distance and real distance are two unrelated measurements . 2 even if the distance is right the line may not be conditioned for adsl. 3 . If it is going to work a human technician has to apply eyeballs, brains and hands , in that order . good luck

Claybraker

join:2002-04-13
none

reply to FAQFixer
said by FAQFixer See Profile :

The differences in distance for service offered by a CO based DSLAM compared to an RT base is interesting.
Yep, considering the RT may or may not have the back-haul capability, and may or may not be ADSL2+ capable. ie 6Meg from a Mini-Ram fed by T1's ain't likely to happen at 8.5kft on 26 gauge.

Every distance table I've seen is flawed to some extent. It's not like the service will work perfect at 8,499ft and then it goes to crap at 8,501ft. There are too many variables involved.

But that was the purpose behind Max-Sync anyway.

RJ44

join:2001-10-19
Atlanta, GA

reply to Gflash
said by Gflash :

there is no difference whatever in the equipment between the c.o. or the dslam they are exactly the same . the outer limits on adsl are as follows.... 1.5 meg = 24k ft 3 meg = 18k ft 6 meg = 9k ft .
Unfortunately your facts are incorrect. As Wayjac says, 1.5 meg is 18kf, 3 meg 13kf. 6 meg I believe is 5.5kf or up to 8kf if your line is ADSL2+ capable.

Will it work at longer distances? Sure, in some cases. But those are the lengths used by the loop qualification system in the former BellSouth region.


Gflash

@bellsouth.net

Ok . Somtimes the c.o. or the remote are setup to be adsl2+ but the preformance of the equipment is not dependent on if it is in the C.O. or not . They are installed randomly . You are quoting loop qualification distances . the distance the company will sell the service to . I am talking about the actual distances that I have provisioned to. On Adsl2+ I have seen 6 meg working at 13k ft . My facts are not incorrect . We are talking about two different sets of related facts in the former Bellsouth region .


Hayward
K A R - 1 2 0 C
Premium
join:2000-07-13
Key West, FL


edit:
July 10th, @01:14AM

reply to logic1977
said by logic1977 See Profile :

Yes I agree it is interesting. But would you believe me when I say that the RT doesn't have a longer loop limit?
I think they meant as total additional distance to the CO limit, not added on new distance.

I am at ~7200 ft (direct to CO)... just enough with any line conditions to make 6.0 unreliable and rarely over 4.5 kbs... went back to 3.0 which has always been full speed rock solid reliable.
--
»haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West)

RJ44

join:2001-10-19
Atlanta, GA


edit:
July 10th, @11:35AM

reply to Gflash
said by Gflash :

You are quoting loop qualification distances . the distance the company will sell the service to . I am talking about the actual distances that I have provisioned to.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about. Most customers are going to be held to the qualification limits, so I figure that's what most customers care about.


ycool

join:2001-12-04
Miami, FL
reply to ycool
Thank You all for your help. I got what i needed from your posts.


BlackEyedPeas

@bellsouth.com
reply to ycool
More than likely the distance from the C.O. is less because it is normally 26ga cable coming out of the Central Office.From the RT site Is normally 24 to 22 Ga cable feeding the Outside Plant.

NetTech2

join:2004-04-14
Mount Olive, AL

said by BlackEyedPeas :

More than likely the distance from the C.O. is less because it is normally 26ga cable coming out of the Central Office.From the RT site Is normally 24 to 22 Ga cable feeding the Outside Plant.
Nope, your info is incorrect. Cable gauge from the RT site towards the customer can be anything from 19 (old rural plant) to 26 gauge. We work on all kinds of whacked loop makeup in trying to get reliable DSL service to our customers.
-
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T SoutheastAnyone else losing sync - weekends? »
« [Services] AT&T Wi-Fi  


Friday, 29-Aug 22:01:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [328] Comcast 250GB Cap Goes Live October 1
· [222] FBI To Allow Warrantless Investigations
· [150] Industry Reacts To Comcast Cap Plans
· [130] AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity
· [123] Time Warner Cable Cripples TiVO, Gets FCC Fine
· [119] Why Run FTTH When You Can Pretend You Do?
· [67] Telus CAPS 'Unlimited' EVDO Data Plans
· [65] Game Publishers Follow The RIAA's Lead
· [60] Qwest Defends Not Running FTTH
· [54] Dish First To Be All MPEG-4
Most people now reading
· [iPhone] Did I Buy A Fake iPhone? [All things Macintosh]
· Comcast has new Acceptable Use Policy besides the 250GB cap [Comcast HSI]
· Windows Genuine Advantage Notification (KB905474) [Security]
· Harley Davidson bikes should be banned [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· How-to: make ActionTec MI424-WR a network bridge [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· IMPORTANT: If you are planning on canceling because of caps [Comcast HSI]
· [Rant] Electricity prices [Rants, Raves, & Praise]
· What happens with returns at supermarkets [General Questions]