<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: i may be dreaming, but... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20749380</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:08:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:08:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: i may be dreaming, but...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20749380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> : I agree.   I find it irritating that cable companies are enrypting the digital versions of their "clear analog" counterparts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20749380</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:39:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>i may be dreaming, but...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20749221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1407044"><b>cornelius785</b></A> : would it be so bad to turn those analog channels into 'clear QAM' with no restrictions? i know this is a stretch, but would be pretty sweet for those with clear QAM tuners.  i'd say it almost say that this idea is almost an equivalent to the current way cable is (in general) where there is one set of highly restricted channels and one set of channels in which you can do whatever you want with for the most part.  i doubt this will ever happen, but i still can dream, right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20749221</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:59:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
