Re: Ironic... in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20751781 en Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:19:02 EDT Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:19:02 EDT Re: Ironic... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20754986 phxmark : It is a hosted set up. We don't manage it. My boss thought it would be cheaper to use a hosting company so we don't have to manage or purchase hardware or operating systems.
--
High speed is dangerous. Too many MP3s, not enough time.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20754986 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:12:27 EDT Re: Ironic... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753351 NetAdmin :
said by phxmark See Profile :

Clustering is still not perfect. The cluster system our central office uses, which is remote, has issues constantly.
What are you guys using for your setup ?
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753351 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:00:32 EDT Re: Ironic... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752722 phxmark : Clustering is still not perfect. The cluster system our central office uses, which is remote, has issues constantly. Especially when they don't sync up properly. The cluster is at two different sites connected by DS3 and they are constantly not synced. It is managed and hosted by an outside company. My boss thought it would be cost saving and increase our availability for the system, but now he is under the gun from higher ups with the issues of this system. Ended up costing two to three times and availability has gone from 98% to 92%. Makes the whole IT department look bad. I am not for cloud computing at this time. Still too many bugs to work out.
--
High speed is dangerous. Too many MP3s, not enough time.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752722 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:54:31 EDT Re: Ironic... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20751781 NetAdmin :
said by Dryvlyne See Profile :

Why would anyone want to go back to the days of a more centralized system again where the risk of a single point of failure grow exponentially?
A MYRIAD of reasons... Single install/update/upgrade point... Better security... Easier license tracking... It increases the useful lifespan of the client system... Lower utility costs (assuming the use of thin clients)...

As for the single point of failure concerns, there are lots of solutions that can lessen or eliminate those problems. For example, VM clustering with failover comes to mind.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20751781 Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:03:53 EDT Ironic... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20748839 Dryvlyne : I find it somewhat ironic that we went from the days of mainframe (aka centralized) computing, to distributed computing and now it's coming back around again to "cloud" (aka centralized) computing again. Why would anyone want to go back to the days of a more centralized system again where the risk of a single point of failure grow exponentially? Thanks, but I'll stick with my Personal Ccomputer and client-side software as much as possible.
--
In relative terms life is shorter than the blink of an eye. Remember that each and every day because in the end it's not about what you've done but how you've lived.
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20748839 Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:54:42 EDT