<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20752792</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:07:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:07:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753859</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Actually the RF technology we will be deploying is based on the IEEE 802.16e fully mobile WiMAX standard.<br><br>A mobile user will handover seamlessly from one AP to another with no interruption of service.  <br><br>This is the same WiMAX that Sprint XOHM will use.  And we use the same vendors.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753859</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:05:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753796</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856374"><b>jester121</b></A> : You said it. Semantics.  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753796</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753782</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hawgcaller <A HREF="/useremail/u/1352184"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Matt <A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>[<br>My fiber optic is not a clear wire. It has a reflective coating that forces the light to travel along a certain path.<br> </div>It sounds like you need to do some research on Total Internal Reflection (&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_inte&middot;&middot;&middot;flection</A>).  There isn't a "reflecitve coating" in fiber optic cable.<br><br>-phil<br> </div>Semantics. The boundary layer (cladding) reflects the light along a specific path through the core.<br><br>Regardless, my main point was that the fiber optic cable (nor the fiber strand(s) inside) is not "clear".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753782</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:21:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1352184"><b>hawgcaller</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Matt <A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>[<br>My fiber optic is not a clear wire. It has a reflective coating that forces the light to travel along a certain path.<br> </div>It sounds like you need to do some research on Total Internal Reflection (&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_internal_reflection" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_inte&middot;&middot;&middot;flection</A>).  There isn't a "reflecitve coating" in fiber optic cable.<br><br>-phil]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753742</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:15:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753453</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : That deal, in which Clearwire and Sprint would split the country and roam on each others networks, has been scrapped- the new plan is to merge Xohm and Clearwire into a company that will be 51% owned by Sprint- there will be no distinction between the two networks after the merger.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753453</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:22:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753364</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jester121 <A HREF="/useremail/u/856374"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Fiber optic is a clear wire. Wireless means there is no wire. :uhh:<br><br>If that's what they're going for then they are too cute by half.<br> </div>My fiber optic is not a clear wire. It has a reflective coating that forces the light to travel along a certain path.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753364</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:03:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464133"><b>a333</b></A> : But what guru decided to use such a badly-reputated brand name to market their superior network under?<br>BTW, it's mainly known as XOHM, not Clearwire. ClearCrap will only own part of the network and shoulder part of the associated costs/profits...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753329</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:56:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753323</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856374"><b>jester121</b></A> : Fiber optic is a clear wire. Wireless means there is no wire. :uhh:<br><br>If that's what they're going for then they are too cute by half.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753323</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:54:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1254547"><b>ihateskapunk</b></A> : what genius didn't realize that it's a play on words...CLEAR WIRE... a wire thats clear...like wireless....hmmm]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753273</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:43:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753200</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856374"><b>jester121</b></A> : What marketing genius decided to sell wireless service with a brand name like ClearWIRE. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753200</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:30:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464133"><b>a333</b></A> : Because clearwire uses a crappy fixed specification of WiMax. <br>The new Xohm network will use much superior technology compared to ClearCrap, which will have better backhaul and will actually be truly mobile. <br>The new network may be split with clearwire, but it sure as hell won't use existing ClearCrap equipment. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20753194</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:29:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752862</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : Technically, their deal hasn't gone through, so Sprint has to do everything on their own for now in their launch- once the deal goes through the early Xohm network will be merged with Clearwire, though Sprint may keep Xohm branding on Sprint-sold services.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752862</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:25:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752830</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1471691"><b>DoRight</b></A> : Then why is Sprint treating it like it has nothing to do with Clearwire on a lot of their articles that I have seen?<br>From what I have seen and the newsletters I get Sprint is still using the XOHM name and Clearwire is stilling deploying their services with the backing of the others like Sprint, Camcast, Inetl etc..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752830</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:17:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752792</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/766673"><b>CMoore2004</b></A> : Sprint's WiMax IS Clearwire, just a new company with investments from some big players.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752792</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:09:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Clearwire pricing/Competition or Partner</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1471691"><b>DoRight</b></A> : How is this going to price against their partner Clearwire. Clearwire will be launching in Bmore by end of year also.. Clearwire's speeds do not compare right now to what Wimax will offer..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20752763</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:04:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
