<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile? in Canadian Broadband</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20756510</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:58:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:58:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20756510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1267354"><b>Bicephale</b></A> : Hi Guspaz,<br><br>Thanks for the suggestion, MLP certainly sounds like<br>it is quite a dynamic project, from what i can read!<br><br> :D<br><br>I'm simply too involved with DSL technology to even<br>consider switching to cable until at least Christmass<br>but the chances are that cable might win the battle,<br>eventually, should DSL turn out to be unsatisfying.<br><br>Unequaled speed options become available in the 65 $<br>range with Cable offers by Videotron (and/or possibly<br>ElectronicBox), after all;  only, i make some moves<br>slowly and i won't know what it will be for quite a<br>while - at least until i've seen enough SpeedTouch vs<br>SpeedStream comparisons, etc.  I wonder if MLP isn't<br>an option for some MoDem FirmWares, actually...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20756510</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:38:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20754620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/510249"><b>Guspaz</b></A> : Interleaved isn't all that bad... That said, I'd rather not be on interleaved ;)<br><br>If money is no object, you can always bond two DSL lines using MLPPP. Your effective speeds will be equal to or greater than one single line.<br><br>JayMan is doing much the same thing. The best he can get is 3/800, so he bonds two lines to get 6/1.6. If you consider downstream performance, he gets almost identical performance with his two lines on my single 6/800 line. Of course, his upstream is a tad better ;)<br><br>Due to the amount of interest in MLPPP, it's now fairly well understood how to implement it on most platforms. As such, it has never been easier to use. There are also currently certain other benefits, involving certain "satanic boxes", as JF would put it ;)<br><br>EDIT: Errm, that assumes that you're still on an ISP that supports MLPPP. Velcom does, TekSavvy does, eBox supposedly does (going to try to get a test account from them to work with), and Acanac will in the future.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20754620</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:52:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20751490</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1267354"><b>Bicephale</b></A> : Oh, and i forgot to mention those statistics were<br>gathered via TelNet from my GNet GBB2060-Xi, on a<br>text-mode TelNet client (e.g. 'Kermit' for Linux)...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20751490</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:36:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20743777</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1267354"><b>Bicephale</b></A> : Hi HiVolt,<br><br>I have confidence in your informed opinions so if<br>something is wrong it's the wall-to-wall Interleaved<br>solution we get when Bell's wiring fails to the task!<br><br> ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20743777</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:14:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20741847</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/273051"><b>HiVolt</b></A> : I think all of the profiles with 512k upstream are interleaved, but I could be wrong.<br><small>--<br>,,!,,('-'),,!,,</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20741847</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:01:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is there a 4032/512 Kbps FastPath profile?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20739939</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1267354"><b>Bicephale</b></A> : Hi,<br><br>From the looks of it this might be the best i can hope<br>for if i fail to clean my domestic wiring starting from the<br>demarcation point.  By the way, the person who came<br>home to deal with Bell's old bakelite item was quite<br>surprizingly pleasant to talk to.  My warmest salutations<br>go to Pascal who worked on a case located in Limoilou<br>at the end of this afternoon!  Thanks Pascal if you read<br>this!  The replacement box has the classic "box inside a<br>box" design with a "side" for each party:  Bell and me.<br><br>It won't be very difficult to filter the voice circuit but<br>i was told by two Bell workers that the protector/POTS<br>splitter with an ADSL outlet was a rare item in Quebec<br>city!  Anyway, i measured 47 dB of Local/DownStream<br>Attenuation and 26 dB of Remote/UpStream Attenuation,<br>the SNR Margin for Local/DownStream was 17.5 dB near<br>18 h and 7 dB for Remote/UpStream.  The "Maximum<br>Attainable" was 5876 Kbps so a thumb-rule calculation<br>allows me to estimate the final DownStream Profile speed<br>to be 4032 Kbps if nothing improves significantly - which<br>is why i'm curious about the 4032/512 Kbps FastPath<br>profile if it exists at all...  That's all the information i coud<br>gather in the middle of a very busy day, i'll update later.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20739939</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:27:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
