pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
 ·Comcast
| reply to NetAdmin
Re: Yawn...
said by NetAdmin  :Your statement is ironic because most people aren't watching HD channels as most people haven't upgraded their televisions to HD or aren't willing to pay for HD service/equipment. Where's the incentive to upgrade if cable companies are wasting cash on crap like public access instead of more HD channels?
--
This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate! |
|
jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:
| said by pnh102 : Where's the incentive to upgrade if cable companies are wasting cash on crap like public access instead of more HD channels? What cash? Cable just provides channel space...any dollars they actually have to spend on public access gets passed right on, and your statement assumes that the companies would spend the little money we're actually talking about on upgrades as opposed to adding to the bottom line.
--
If they told you wolverines would make good house pets, would you believe them?
-"Planes, Trains & Automobiles" |
|
NetAdmin
CCNA
join:2008-05-22
2 edits | reply to pnh102
said by pnh102 :Where's the incentive to upgrade if cable companies are wasting cash on crap like public access instead of more HD channels? The cost of providing those public access channels is a lot less than most people think. The biggest cost of providing a channel, programming costs, are non-existent with public access channels.
And adding HD channels isn't just as simple as just wanting to add a new channel to the lineup. For example, the source has to broadcast in HD, hence the reason Sci-Fi took so long to be available in HD. If the channels aren't available in HD, no one is getting it.
Whoops, had to fix a typo...
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat... |
|
