<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759406</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:30 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:18:30 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20764864</link>
<description><![CDATA[quanta posted : Well, you'd want some restrictions on 25 to mitigate spam relaying.<br><br>As for port 80...technically web servers are not allowed although Bell adopts a "don't ask/don't tell" policy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20764864</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:42:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20763925</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : You'd love rogers cable internet up in Canada. Almost all the ports are blocked.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20763925</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:46:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20763880</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : We're talking about Bell Canada they could care less about any legitimate user who uses VPN. As a matter of fact Bell speed throttles all their business customers down to 30 kilobytes per second just like all their residential customers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20763880</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:48:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20760594</link>
<description><![CDATA[steve1515 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1192923" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1192923');">Uncomm0n</a>:</small><br><br>... When I pay for Internet access, I expect all outgoing/incoming ports <b>(except incoming on port 80 and outgoing on port 25)</b> to be wide open with no throttling.<br> </div>I really hate to see comments like this. I don't really find it acceptable that any ports are blocked. People shouldn't be OK with this. When I pay for Internet access, I expect all outgoing/incoming ports to be wide open with no throttling.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20760594</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:52:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759853</link>
<description><![CDATA[Phil posted : Yes, I was being quite sarcastic.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759853</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:30:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759836</link>
<description><![CDATA[Uncomm0n posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/408205" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=408205');">Phil</a>:</small><br><br>They should charge extra for certain ports, VPN included.  This in addition to overage charges on low monthly caps sounds like a winning strategy to not spend money on infrastructure and please the customer base.<br> </div>I hope you're being sarcastic.  That in no way would "please the customer base."  When I pay for Internet access, I expect all outgoing/incoming ports (except incoming on port 80 and outgoing on port 25) to be wide open with no throttling.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759836</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:28:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759593</link>
<description><![CDATA[Phil posted : They should charge extra for certain ports, VPN included.  This in addition to overage charges on low monthly caps sounds like a winning strategy to not spend money on infrastructure and please the customer base.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759593</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:44:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759520</link>
<description><![CDATA[accusync posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1300454" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1300454');">Anomaly95</a>:</small><br><br>Wouldn't that screw the legit users of VPN (businesses, etc.)?<br> </div>Since when did that little detail bother Sympatico/ Bell?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759520</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:32:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759511</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anomaly95 posted : Wouldn't that screw the legit users of VPN (businesses, etc.)?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759511</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:31:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hopefully they won&#x27;t block VPN access now</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759406</link>
<description><![CDATA[DaSneaky1D posted : Bell Canada has already wielded a big sword against P2P on wholesale providers' access. Who's to say they won't do the same for VPN access?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.djesigns.com">:: my trivial ramblings ::</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Hopefully-they-wont-block-VPN-access-now-20759406</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:13:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

