<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: U.S. Is Neither Lagging Nor Stalling in Broadband Adoption? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20760191</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:23:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:23:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: U.S. Is Neither Lagging Nor Stalling in Broadband Adoption?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20760191</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : 1.5/384 is broadband, though... to me "broadband expanding" sounds like people getting broadband who didn't have it before.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20760191</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:28:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>U.S. Is Neither Lagging Nor Stalling in Broadband Adoption?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20759563</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/769954"><b>XknightHawkX</b></A> : Who's greasing the writers wheels? Broadband is only expanding in areas where they will make money hand over fist. They will not upgrade or expand the area that they will only make a little bit of money. How am I stuck with a 1.5/384 if broadband is expanding. Verizon has no plans to upgrade my area. And I just happen to live in a large trailer court that provides us cable from direct tv. That happens to mean I can't get cable internet cause we aren't connected to the local cable company.<br><br>I'll believe broadband is expanding when I start seeing everyone here talking about their area getting something new or upgraded.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20759563</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:40:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
