<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: People still use this? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20768781</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:02:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20779237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/420841"><b>KaziSmith</b></A> : Well, using your analogy, you can put as many deadbolts as you like on a "door" but the lock is only as good as the frame and door holding the two in place. The door/frame can fail with the lock being in perfect condition.<br><br>But as you stated, <br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  voipdabbler <A HREF="/useremail/u/1352917"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Then keep in mind that you're still not safe.  :-)  <br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20779237</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:41:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20777302</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Free version is not bloated. Works fine. Microsoft is the problem. Get linux. Industrial strength firewall, easy easy to configure - most DSL transceivers (modems) have this firewall installed (IP Tables). Tivo works real good too, right? Linux inside!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20777302</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:27:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20771533</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/229804"><b>B</b></A> : The early versions are STILL great.  I continue to use ZoneAlarm Free 2.6.362 all day, every day, on multiple XP computers.  Never a problem.  Different software, service packs, different VPNs, sleeping laptops, roaming networks; it just works.<br><br>-- B<br><small>--<br>In a realm outside causality and function</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20771533</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:10:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20771037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1406472"><b>VerizonCynic</b></A> : works fine for me. free version only. the patch worked fine]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20771037</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:31:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20769904</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1352917"><b>voipdabbler</b></A> : LOL, yes.  I run 2 software-based firewalls (one is ZA), plus the router and a good anti-virus program that is set to scan my full system daily.  You can never be too careful using the Internet.  View it as a big door to a room containing your most valuable possessions.  Put good locks + multiple deadbolts on it.  Then keep in mind that you're still not safe.  :-)  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20769904</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:02:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768907</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/446561"><b>spewak</b></A> : Well, yes. I do anyhow. It did prevent me from getting online until I turned off the firewall and was able to go to the website and promptly download the updated version.<br>Familiarity breeds contempt I guess.<br><small>--<br>The weekend is here, grab a can of beer!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768907</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:35:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768816</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1547450"><b>Madtown</b></A> : I used ZA up until Tuesday afternoon, well last night I decided to switch over to Comodo and try that out for a while. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768816</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:16:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768781</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464060"><b>zenafu</b></A> : I was surprised too, 'people still use this app?' I said outloud just now. But apparently, yep. I used to use it back when I was on Win '98 and it was light and very effective but from what I hear it's pretty bloated now. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768781</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:05:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>People still use this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768714</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/843138"><b>Matt</b></A> : People still use ZA? Wow. The early versions were great, but it quickly became bloated, and like the Norton/Symantec products, caused more problems than it prevented.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20768714</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:41:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
