Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast Flips, Flops Way Around Throttling Lawsuit » Business As Usual
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
282
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Color me impressed...  
AuthorAll Replies
-


newview
Ex .. Ex .. Exactly
Premium
join:2001-10-01
Parsonsburg, MD
reply to TIGERON
Re: Business As Usual

said by TIGERON See Profile :

Company is run by liars.

Bingo


cork1958
Cork

join:2000-02-26
Fruitport, MI
·Verizon Online DSL
·Charter Pipeline

reply to meister_sd
said by meister_sd See Profile :

said by major marco See Profile :

Just another case of yet another giant American corporation (1) Cherry-picking as to when it wants to be regulated vs. not, and (2) Demonstrating what a complete and utter joke the FCC is.
Amen, Brother!
Yep, double that amen, brother. Just another way for the rich and mighty to payoff whoever they may need to, to trample whomever they may need to.
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/


meister_sd
Premium
join:2006-01-29
La Mesa, CA

reply to major marco
said by major marco See Profile :

Just another case of yet another giant American corporation (1) Cherry-picking as to when it wants to be regulated vs. not, and (2) Demonstrating what a complete and utter joke the FCC is.
Amen, Brother!

TIGERON

join:2008-03-11
Pacifica, CA
reply to major marco
Company is run by liars.

moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to garmst
said by garmst See Profile :

It is the job of COMCAST's lawyers to defend COMCAST's interest in court. It is the complaintants lawyers to argue its case as well. The judge applies the law to the process.

I expect and want COMCAST to pursue its interests in court. Its job is not to lie down and be trampled by the litigants. COMCAST's lawyers made a good argument and the judge accepted it. Good job!

The case is suspended, not dismissed. It will come back another day.
The problem becomes when Comcast jumps sides.

If Comcast argues that the FCC has no jurisdiction and wins, then if they ever argue that the FCC does have jurisdiction, the precedent only hurts them.

What are Comcast's lawyers going to say? They were mistaken the first time? That they were for it before they were against it?

garmst

join:2000-09-17
New York, NY
·Speakeasy

reply to major marco
It is the job of COMCAST's lawyers to defend COMCAST's interest in court. It is the complaintants lawyers to argue its case as well. The judge applies the law to the process.

I expect and want COMCAST to pursue its interests in court. Its job is not to lie down and be trampled by the litigants. COMCAST's lawyers made a good argument and the judge accepted it. Good job!

The case is suspended, not dismissed. It will come back another day.


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

The judge made the decision - not Comcast.

The judge did, in fact, make the decision, however Comcast's attorneys made the argument. You make it out like the California judge made it entirely on his own without either side having said anything and that's just not accurate. It is your one-sided opinion.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to major marco
The judge made the decision - not Comcast.

And Comcast comments on the subject:
A Comcast spokesperson denied there was any contradiction "What we have argued in the Hart case is that the FCC believes it has jurisdiction here, and the court should wait to see what action the FCC takes," the spokesperson said.

At the same time, federal judges in Washington, who would decide any appeal of the FCC's actions, won't necessarily come to the same conclusion as a federal judge in California.

--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
clubs:

while Comcast has argued on the federal level that the FCC lacks the authority to punish them, they're arguing in California that the FCC does in fact have that authority, making these localized lawsuits unnecessary.


Just another case of yet another giant American corporation (1) Cherry-picking as to when it wants to be regulated vs. not, and (2) Demonstrating what a complete and utter joke the FCC is.
--
The Toll

Tracking Lord Stanley
Forums » Comcast Flips, Flops Way Around Throttling Lawsuit« Color me impressed...  


Sunday, 06-Dec 10:53:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [128] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· How fast is your upstream internet connection? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bulb for garage door opener [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Internet]Bell 16max upload sync problem! upl sync only 796! [Bell Canada]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· worried about the 1333mw card: think again [Wireless Service Providers]