http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769377 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:31:50 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:31:50 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20773763
I updated using the MS patch, and thanks to 8signs and some common sense..everything is just peachy.

I liked ZA back in v. 2.6 I think it was..then I learned how to use rules-based FW's and never looked back.

Simple is good.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20773763 Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:33:48 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769869 said by evilghost:

If the issue is caused by DNS source-port randomization why not simply create a rule to allow egress UDP with SRC PORT 'any' to UDP dport 53, or is ZA so luser friendly that this cannot be done?
That can be done quite easily. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769869 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:57:42 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769726 said by DataDoc:

95% of users don't know what you just said.
LOL. agree. have been a computer user since way back in the days of the prototypical ibm pc xt & at & i don't have a clue what he/she said.......bub ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769726 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:29:29 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769440 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Update-the-rule-20769440 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:29:54 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Update-the-rule-20769377 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Update-the-rule-20769377 Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:14:58 EDT