said by Jodokast96:Maybe it could be clarified in
ALL of these articles that all they are doing is dumping the stuff that is held on
THEIR servers. That in effect means they are providing the content, regardless of who actually put it there. The ISP's
DO have the responsibility to police that. They are not blocking access to third-party servers. It's really not very different than if it were posted on YouTube. If YouTube left it up there, they'd be just as resonsible. The difference is that YouTube would have it removed as soon as it was found or complained about. The ISP's in this case weren't doing that, and got caught by the AG.
you have no idea what you are talking about with respect to usenet or the internet and its implementation.
You are so wrong on so many points here my head hurts and i cant bring myself to write the novel it will take to correct the mistakes.
