 dnoyeBFerrous Phallus join:2000-10-09 Southfield, MI | Woodworking Does this mean I won't get to see pics from folks on those networks on alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking anymore??? |
|
 | said by dnoyeB:Does this mean I won't get to see pics from folks on those networks on alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking anymore??? Depends. If they really removed "alt.binary" it won't make a difference. If they removed "alt.binaries" you won't see pics from those ISPs subscribers there unless they use an alternate news provider. |
|
|
|
 | reply to dnoyeB said by dnoyeB:Does this mean I won't get to see pics from folks on those networks on alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking anymore??? heh heh he said wood. That's probably one of those child porn groups they don't want you to see, anyways! You should know better, AOL sure does!  |
|
 | said by jgantert:said by dnoyeB:Does this mean I won't get to see pics from folks on those networks on alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking anymore??? heh heh he said wood. That's probably one of those child porn groups they don't want you to see, anyways! You should know better, AOL sure does! child porn does not exist my friend its a hoax a pretext to shut off server a pretext to scare you into submission into losing your freedom to share files |
|
 QumahlinNever Enough TimePremium,MVM join:2001-10-05 united state | said by attsbcisgay:said by jgantert:said by dnoyeB:Does this mean I won't get to see pics from folks on those networks on alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking anymore??? heh heh he said wood. That's probably one of those child porn groups they don't want you to see, anyways! You should know better, AOL sure does! child porn does not exist my friend its a hoax a pretext to shut off server a pretext to scare you into submission into losing your freedom to share files Wrong, its absolutely none of the above and I assure you that child porn on NG's does exist, but not nearly at the rate that it exists on services such as limewire.
It has nothing to do with your "Freedom" it has to do with the expense of operating a costly service that is used by less than 5% of your userbase and out of that 5% only 0.5% are using it for actual text/newsgroup purposes, the rest are using it to get copyrighted material. |
|
 | said by Qumahlin:It has nothing to do with your "Freedom" it has to do with the expense of operating a costly service that is used by less than 5% of your userbase Oh, I agree completely, btw. It was just a great opportunity for a Beavis & Butthead tie-in. 
I'm with Verizon, and have switched to a 3rd party provider, and have been enjoying unfiltered usenet for the last few weeks. I didn't realize how much I have been missing! I wonder if the usage has actually gone up since the change? I know my usage has. |
|