site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

1 edit

reply to Jodokast96

Re: Good

NO FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST IT DOESN'T MAKE THEM LIABLE OF CULPABLE. USENET is INTERNATIONAL.

Its call safe harbor/common carrier. They are merely the conduit of the information not the creator or poster.

The US Law backs them up and has been validated in many court cases already.

Usenet providers are NOT liable for the content that traverses or resides their servers.

All this noise about this is just that NOISE. There was NO TOS violated.

IF that were the case all porn links or ANY objectionable material would be have be blocked because in some way shape or form it resides on a carriers servers/routers/proxies.

This is all grand standing. There is NO merit in his charges of these carriers providing KP to folks. Its categorically untrue but makes for good press.

These cries of "its all about the children" ring hollow these days when all these press releases after being analyzed show that insignificant amounts of alleged child porn were found.


hopeflicker
Capitalism breeds greed
Premium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
kudos:1

Next we'll see ISP's that block torrent sites.

what's next? your youtube?


PittsPgh
Premium
join:2003-08-21
Pittsburgh, PA
kudos:1

said by hopeflicker:

Next we'll see ISP's that block torrent sites.

what's next? your youtube?
Let's not forget the Yahoo Groups. Full of porn also.
Gmail groups are there also.

Wednesday, 30-May 20:14:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics