<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: No surprise in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20776329</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:03:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:03:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: No surprise</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20776329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : Be realistic with your rant. How many times has phone raised or changed it's rate structure, causing a rate increase compared to the amount of times that Cox has raised it's rates?<br><br>So far, cox is right. Phone has been the king of adding fees. When you look at a typical phone bill as compared to a typical cable bill, do you need an accountant to figure out your cable bill? How about your phone bill?<br><br>My qwest bill for 1 line was always 5 pages long. My cable bill, just one. Qwest needed 5 ages to print out all the "fees" they were loading up on my service. Somehow, my $45.00 phone service became $67.00 a month.. all fees.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20776329</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:33:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>No surprise</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20774481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641559"><b>bigskank</b></A> : And no doubt I'll continue to see stupid cox commercials on television talking about how "the old phone company" keeps on raising prices.  And how "the old phone company" sneaks in new hidden fees.<br><br>Pot.  Kettle.  Black.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20774481</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:24:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
