Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
 ·Colbanet
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| reply to oh LOOK
Re: Bells NEW July 11th CRTC Submission
My favourite bit of bullshit:
quote:
It is called “Deep Packet Inspection” because it looks beyond the routing and transport headers, deeper into the application packet headers, to determine the type of application that is communicating, but not the content itself (see figure below).
That's nice, except APPLICATION HEADERS ARE PART OF THE CONTENT ITSELF. As in, they are the payload of the TCP packet. You need to look at the CONTENT to get the application headers. |
|
Robrr
join:2008-04-19
Toronto, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
 ·Rogers Hi-Speed
2 edits | said by Guspaz  :My favourite bit of bullshit: quote:
It is called “Deep Packet Inspection” because it looks beyond the routing and transport headers, deeper into the application packet headers, to determine the type of application that is communicating, but not the content itself (see figure below).
That's nice, except APPLICATION HEADERS ARE PART OF THE CONTENT ITSELF. As in, they are the payload of the TCP packet. You need to look at the CONTENT to get the application headers. This document better be legit because this alone is the smoking gun that will give CAIP, CIPPIC, the Privacy Commissioner, the CRTC and probably a LOT of other people more than enough ammo to destroy Bell in its FULL ENTIRETY.
That single statement is more than enough cause the complete removal of that equipement.
Once again if this document is legit CAIP should seriously push to for the IMMEDIATE CEASE AND DESIST of the throttling. This is the exact same as the post office reading your mail. |
|
