ragingwolf
join:2003-04-22
Nepean, ON
| reply to oh LOOK
Re: Bells NEW July 11th CRTC Submission
Ya that document is full of BS, they even reference rogers a bunch of times, when cable and dsl are completely different technologies.
The way they conveniently leave out the physical layer to the network is ridiculous. What happened to the pppoe layer bell? Do they honestly think people are dumb enough to think that an entire connection can't be throttled?
And figure 4 makes me want to laugh. Using an isp like teksavvy, at no point in bell's network are data packets in the form of tcp streams, which makes this representation completely, utterly false. |
|
pnjunction
Teksavvy Premium
Premium
join:2008-01-24
Toronto, ON
 ·TekSavvy Solutions..
| said by ragingwolf  :What happened to the pppoe layer bell? No kidding. I didn't read it but looked at the figures. They show the IP, TCP, application and data layers but negelct to mention that they're ALL inside PPPoE packets they they're supposed to deliver unmolested to their customers/competition.
The fact that I didn't know whether to refer to 3rd-party ISPs as customers or competition is really the underlying issue here. Until this conflict of interest is rectified, Bell is going to do whatever they can to screw us over (no ADSL2, no access to RDSLAMs, and so on). |
|
