site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
64
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Vamp
5c077
Premium
join:2003-01-28
MD
kudos:1

Nice..

Guess by cable they mean under sea fiber..

This should improve Alaska's latency to the US since it is a shorter path than going around and through Canada and many hops in between.
--
20/20 FIOS || MSN Msgr: scott001^gmail_com


captain456

@gci.com

said by Vamp:

Guess by cable they mean under sea fiber..

This should improve Alaska's latency to the US since it is a shorter path than going around and through Canada and many hops in between.
You are completely wrong. There are no direct connections between alaska and Canada. There are currently 3 fiber connections connecting Anchorage to the Lower 48. 2 of them are owned by GCI 1 is owned by AT&T. ACS (the telco laying this fiber) currently uses AT&T's fiber.

All Alaska traffic runs through Washington or Oregon before going anywhere else in the world including Canada. So the new fiber should really have no noticable differences in latency.

I don't know the exact figures but I'm pretty sure the current fiber is less than 2 or 3% utilized right now anyway. Theres no current need for this fiber as far as Alaska as a whole is concerned, but the Telco ACS will now have their own backhaul to the lower 48 without having to use AT&T's fiber.

Thursday, 31-May 02:42:38 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics