site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1329
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


P Ness
You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already
Premium
join:2001-08-29
way way out

What is Child Porn

»perezhilton.com/2008-07-12-miley···st-naked

ok according to most laws this would be considered child pron

same with the pictures of her in that mag.

any poses of lude sexual positions by underage girls is considered CP.

hell one guy in florida got 3 years for having a web site of girls in bathing suits and underwear...not nude...but lude poses

so where does the line end? jcpenny mags?
--
www.stopfcc.comI do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob.

Madtown
Premium
join:2008-04-26
Madera, CA

1. Miley Cyrus photos aren't child porn, might be offensive to some, but not child porn.

2. A web site of girls (I'm assuming 12 or younger) in bathing suits and underwear isn't child porn, however it's not a website I would look at 24/7, not my cup of pee.

3. Jcpenny mags, I'm assuming the ads with little girls in their bathing suits or panties, not child porn, just advertisment, not my cup of pee either, in fact the only thing I notice is the Best Buy or Circuit City ads.



danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

reply to P Ness
You might want to cite sources for those allegations.

Child porn involves children under the age of 18 engaging in sexual acts or posing nude in sexually provocative poses/positions.

The picture of child nude is NOT child pornography.

The picture of child in a bathing suit or lingerie is NOT child pornography. they must be engaged in a sexual act or suggestive of a sex act.

Sure its an ugly fine line and i find it repugnant that many get close but never cross and can get away with it but its the law and for what its worth it does work.

There are MANY legal sites that have children under the age of 18 in lingerie and swim suits that are highly suggestive BUT not nude and NOT posing in sexual positions.

I don't see these AG's going after them...why? cause they are perfectly legal. offensive to many, but perfectly legal.



ARGONAUT
got ping?
Premium
join:2006-01-24
New Albany, IN

If it's not kiddy porn it's terrorism.



fireflier
Coffee. . .Need Coffee
Premium
join:2001-05-25
Limbo

said by ARGONAUT:

If it's not kiddy porn it's terrorism.
From all the garbage being used to justify eroding any privacy we may have had left, I was under the impression one was pretty much the same as the other.
--
Wishes: When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a meteorite hurtling to the Earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much hosed no matter what you wish for. Unless it's death by meteor. --despair.com


ReformCRTC
Support Your Independent ISP

join:2004-03-07
Canada

reply to P Ness
A 17 year old babe is child porn? Give me a break.


Wednesday, 30-May 16:14:18 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics