zachary1
you talkin' to me?
join:2004-03-07
right here | reply to P Ness
Re: What is Child Porn
A 17 year old babe is child porn? Give me a break. |
|
fireflier
Coffee. . .Need Coffee
Premium
join:2001-05-25
Limbo
 ·Skype
| reply to ARGONAUT
said by ARGONAUT  :If it's not kiddy porn it's terrorism.  From all the garbage being used to justify eroding any privacy we may have had left, I was under the impression one was pretty much the same as the other.
--
Wishes: When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a meteorite hurtling to the Earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much hosed no matter what you wish for. Unless it's death by meteor. --despair.com |
|
ARGONAUT
got ping?
join:2006-01-24
New Albany, IN | reply to danclan
If it's not kiddy porn it's terrorism. |
|
danclan
join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to P Ness
You might want to cite sources for those allegations.
Child porn involves children under the age of 18 engaging in sexual acts or posing nude in sexually provocative poses/positions.
The picture of child nude is NOT child pornography.
The picture of child in a bathing suit or lingerie is NOT child pornography. they must be engaged in a sexual act or suggestive of a sex act.
Sure its an ugly fine line and i find it repugnant that many get close but never cross and can get away with it but its the law and for what its worth it does work.
There are MANY legal sites that have children under the age of 18 in lingerie and swim suits that are highly suggestive BUT not nude and NOT posing in sexual positions.
I don't see these AG's going after them...why? cause they are perfectly legal. offensive to many, but perfectly legal. |
|
Madtown
join:2008-04-26
Madera, CA
| reply to P Ness
1. Miley Cyrus photos aren't child porn, might be offensive to some, but not child porn.
2. A web site of girls (I'm assuming 12 or younger) in bathing suits and underwear isn't child porn, however it's not a website I would look at 24/7, not my cup of pee.
3. Jcpenny mags, I'm assuming the ads with little girls in their bathing suits or panties, not child porn, just advertisment, not my cup of pee either, in fact the only thing I notice is the Best Buy or Circuit City ads. |
|
P Ness
You'Ve Forgotten 9-11 Already
Premium
join:2001-08-29
Mineola, NY
clubs: 
| »perezhilton.com/2008-07-12-miley···st-naked
ok according to most laws this would be considered child pron
same with the pictures of her in that mag.
any poses of lude sexual positions by underage girls is considered CP.
hell one guy in florida got 3 years for having a web site of girls in bathing suits and underwear...not nude...but lude poses
so where does the line end? jcpenny mags?
--
www.stopfcc.comI do not think the government needs to restrict free speech especially on a device that has an off knob. |
|
