<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Town may cut speed camera funding in UK Chat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20793093</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:32:52 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:32:52 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Town may cut speed camera funding</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20794560</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917654"><b>pauldenton</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  poacher 1rtd <A HREF="/useremail/u/960046"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> Will all councils go the same way?<br> </div>very possibly, given the key point in that article:<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Tory-run Swindon Borough Council currently spends about &pound;400,000 to fund speed cameras in the town.<br><br>Its leader, Roderick Bluh, said cash from fines goes to central government and there could be better ways to cut the number of accidents on roads.<br>.<br>.<br>"All of the fines that are collected go back through national government. So we don't get the fines to reinvest. <br>.<br>.<br>The move follows a shake-up of speed camera funding rules which mean the Treasury keeps proceeds of fines and then makes road-safety grants to councils.<hr></blockquote><br><br>now that the council(s) no longer recieve <i>any</i> of the fine revenue, their removal will result in <i>lower</i> council tax... about &pound;5 a year would by my calculation {about 79k properties paying council tax in Swindon...}]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20794560</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:51:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Town may cut speed camera funding</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20793093</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/960046"><b>poacher 1rtd</b></A> :  Will all councils go the same way?<br><br> A council could stop paying for speed cameras because it says they might not be the best way to make roads safer.<br><br> Peter Greenhalgh, said the money spent on cameras could be spent on local safety measures instead.<br><br>"These are far more effective than speed cameras which, I feel, are a blatant tax on the motorist," he said.<br><br>"They are being used as a cash cow. I do take exception to the positioning of some mobile speed cameras. They are designed to raise revenue.<br><br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wiltshire/7506689.stm" >news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wilt&middot;&middot;&middot;6689.stm</A> <br><small>--<br>They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety". Benjamin Franklin.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20793093</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:04:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
