site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


benc
Premium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL
Reviews:
·Charter

reply to qworster

Re: Bandwidth costs practically NOTHING!

Then it appears the question is, how much does it really cost to roll out FTTH to every home in the U.S.?

How about homes within 100 miles of a metro area (with 1M+ pop.)?

How about homes within 50 miles of a metro area?

And how about using those USF funds to pay for this? Or how about a 1% federal sales tax to finance this? However, I'm somewhat loathe to suggest more taxes, since it will undoubtedly be hard to remove or reduce the tax later.

As for having only one broadband choice, I know exactly what you mean. For me it's cable. At least in some ways it's better than having only DSL as a choice, since you'd be limited to 6.0M/768k. Believe it or not, I once met a fellow who said that DSL was his only choice. If he wanted TV he'd have to use Dish or something.


Filiberto

@telnor.net

said by benc:

And how about using those USF funds to pay for this?
If you didn't heard the USF Fund is a waste of Taxpayers money, as the mone never reaches the proyects the Telcos/Cable Companies say the would invest in.

At least not compleatly

Wednesday, 30-May 16:23:52 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics