<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>which router? Linksys WRT 110 or WRT 160N in Linksys</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20795424</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:27:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:27:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: which router? Linksys WRT 110 or WRT 160N</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : i have the wrt 160n, and am very happy with it...though i never used the wireless,,, wired, it works great. like it better than the wpn 824 netgear it replaced.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820473</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:29:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: which router? Linksys WRT 110 or WRT 160N</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20799482</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/566298"><b>PeteC2</b></A> : DDWRT is compatible with the WRT 160N.<br><br>Range difference between the 110N and 160N will be minor, at best.<br><br>My only reason to recommend the 160N, is in terms of future wireless devices, if they are "N"  wireless.<br><br>For a fairly modest cost difference, I would just go with the 160N...which btw, is exactly what I did.  I have 2 home, and one work "G" based notebooks...so I could have saved a couple of bucks, but I figure somwhere shortly down the road, I will have "N" stuff, and the price difference just was not so great.<br><small>--<br>...something is happening here but you don't know what it is...do you, Mr. Jones?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20799482</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:29:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: which router? Linksys WRT 110 or WRT 160N</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20795781</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The WRT110 appears to be a G router with MIMO; not actually a Wireless-N router.<br><br>For a quick comparison of the two: &raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_WRT300N_series" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_WRT300N_series</A><br><br>DD-WRT appears to support the WRT160N. Tomato does not support any N routers yet.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Supported_Devices" >www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Su&middot;&middot;&middot;_Devices</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tomato_Firmware#Supported_devices" >en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tomato_Fir&middot;&middot;&middot;_devices</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20795781</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:02:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>which router? Linksys WRT 110 or WRT 160N</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20795424</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1477761"><b>WilliamDon</b></A> : Which one should I get? I think the difference is that the WRT 160N does MIMO, but not sure what other differences there are.<br>The router will be used with 3 ethernet wired computers and 2 wireless laptops. Neither of the two wireless have Draft-N NIC's, but may be adding a third laptop in the future. The difference in cost is about $20, and assume it may be worth the extra just in case. Anybody have any other suggestions about which one to get? Range is also another potential issue.<br><br>Just looked around here and may also want to try DD-WRT or tomato with this purchase.  Are these compatible with either of these?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20795424</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:47:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
