Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » NYC FiOS Deal Should See Final Approval Today » Why bother
Uniqs:
426		 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Why bother

BA lied to Pennsylvania while getting billions in goodies and they'll do the same to NYC.
permalink · 2008-07-16 15:41:00 · Reply to this
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why bother

Most of the "goodies" in this case are related to running a cable TV system... Why would Verizon go through a long approval process, get approved for cable TV, and then not deploy it? Out of sheer hatred for the City of New York?
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:02:00 · Reply to this

Lika

@verizon.net

Re: Why bother

I don't see how they lied, they just finished laying underground cable all around my area in PA and are still laying down around the area and stringing on the poles.
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:08:48 · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: Why bother

They were supposed to have had it done years ago, more than 1/2 of PA was to have had fiber by 2004.
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:10:15 · Reply to this

Lika

@psu.edu

Re: Why bother

The problem was that that Ed Rendell decided that verizon has to go to every single township and sign the deals with them instead of just signing with PA and having that work state wide. There are a lot of different municipalities in PA as there are in many state. I can imagine that taking a lot of time.
permalink · 2008-07-16 23:23:22 · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: Why bother

That has nothing to do with the original BA Chap 30 requirements.
permalink · 2008-07-17 08:21:44 · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

1 edit		 I never bought into the redlining deal until now. This deal lays out in deal how they're permitted to red line and mark my words...they'll do the best areas first and will be apologetically late with the others.

Meanwhile they will get their goodies like only paying $25 to blow off an appointment.
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:12:49 · Reply to this
myokitis

join:2004-06-19
Alexandria, VA

Re: Why bother

said by Dogfather See Profile :

they'll do the best areas first and will be apologetically late with the others.
I don't get it . . . you're saying they should do the WORST (least profitible) areas first? Riiiight.
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:39:02 · Reply to this
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why bother

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:47:35 · Reply to this
myokitis

join:2004-06-19
Alexandria, VA

Re: Why bother

said by EPS See Profile :

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
So if a business chooses to deploy their capital first where it makes the most economic sense, they're racist. Okay.
permalink · 2008-07-16 16:59:58 · Reply to this
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why bother

I wasn't entirely serious (or serious at all, actually) in my earlier post...

The concern is not so much that less profitable areas will get deployed later, it's whether they'll get deployed to at all.
permalink · 2008-07-16 17:31:02 · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP
said by myokitis See Profile :

said by EPS See Profile :

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
So if a business chooses to deploy their capital first where it makes the most economic sense, they're racist. Okay.
NYC is planting a money tree for Verizon. Verizon, in exchange for access to this very lucrative market should have to follow some basic rules, like EVEN deployment...deployment to all different types of economic areas to insure it all gets done in a timely manner.

Otherwise Verizon is given the opportunity and incentive to break their promises just as they did as BA in Pennsylvania.
permalink · 2008-07-16 18:32:52 · Print · Reply to this

SIFIOSTV

@gs.com
said by myokitis See Profile :

said by EPS See Profile :

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
So if a business chooses to deploy their capital first where it makes the most economic sense, they're racist. Okay.
Actually, in this country even poor people watch plenty of cable TV. So while there may be some economic incentives for wiring the rich areas first, they probably aren't as strong as a lot of people seem to be assuming.
permalink · 2008-07-16 18:37:26 · Print · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

1 edit		 Yeah, I'm saying they shouldn't deploy in rich neighborhoods first and then get to the others they promise whenever they feel like getting around to it which means a week after never.

This is the same type of shit they pulled in Pennsylvania. They got their goodies first and that gave them the opportunity to just completely blow off their requirements.
permalink · 2008-07-16 18:30:11 · Reply to this

elbm

join:2000-08-03
Reisterstown, MD		 There is no evidence of Verizon red-lining in it's current deployment of fttp.

As for the PA thing and those saying BA/Verizon "took the money" and ran-- it is a bunch of mis-truths and a distortion of the facts.
permalink · 2008-07-17 07:26:24 · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

3 edits

Re: Why bother

said by elbm See Profile :

There is no evidence of Verizon red-lining in it's current deployment of fttp.

As for the PA thing and those saying BA/Verizon "took the money" and ran-- it is a bunch of mis-truths and a distortion of the facts.
The article has a chart showing exactly how they're redlining.

You're obviously not very familiar with what Chap 30 required BA to do and in 2002, the PA PUC had an opinion differing from yours...

said by PA PUC :
...this Commission has a legal obligation to reject Verizon PA’s 2000 Update and require it to submit a new update specifying its plans to satisfy its legal obligation to provide a modernized network with broadband capability of at least 45 Mbps upstream and downstream, to be available within five days from the customer request date.
That update that was required of Verizon was never done and finally the PA PUC let them off the hook for Chap 30 while VZ got to keep all the money.

As to how much money all means, I would welcome your attempt to refute the testimony of industry expert Dr. Lee Selwyn who lays out the goodie numbers in great detail.

»www.econtech.com/library/LLS%20P···2002.pdf

The fact is, in the mid 90's BA laid out plans for FTTH. To facilitate this, the PUC deregulated and gave other perks that netted BA BILLIONS of dollars. BA then abandoned those plans, opting to follow the DSL path instead.

And when it finally came time for Verizon to deploy fiber, they slapped PA in the face and deployed first in Texas. BA/VZ didn't meet any of the Chap 30 requirements.
permalink · 2008-07-17 08:21:03 · Print · Reply to this

Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Why bother

said by Dogfather See Profile :

said by elbm See Profile :

There is no evidence of Verizon red-lining in it's current deployment of fttp.

As for the PA thing and those saying BA/Verizon "took the money" and ran-- it is a bunch of mis-truths and a distortion of the facts.
The article has a chart showing exactly how they're redlining.

Which article?
permalink · 2008-07-17 12:06:39 · Print · Reply to this

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

Re: Why bother

»www.gothamgazette.com/article/te···/19/2539

The chart shows the richest areas like Manhattan see full deployment right away, while other 'hoods are left to see deployment later (if ever as we saw in the case of PA).
permalink · 2008-07-17 12:08:25 · Reply to this

Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY

Re: Why bother

100% of single family homes in Manhattan? That's probably about 100. Not a big deal.
Staten Island would be done first.
permalink · 2008-07-21 16:41:40 · Reply to this
Forums » NYC FiOS Deal Should See Final Approval Today

Friday, 27-Nov 19:10:18 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [59] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· IPComms Free DIDs now with sip registration maybe?? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]