<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[HELP] tunnel bandwidth aggregation in Cisco</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20806249</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:17:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [HELP] tunnel bandwidth aggregation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20842253</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894843"><b>Manta</b></A> : Strangely it seems to have started working now.  Two things have happened - I've wiped the 2003 server involved at one end and installed 2008 (for the learning curve, not just because I like the pain!) and a UPS self-test failed resulting in an unexpected reboot of the router at the other end.  I suspect the latter is what made it start working!<br><br>Thanks for the tunnel key hint Tom.  I'm not sure if it fixed it or not to be honest.  If I get a break in the workload I'll try taking it out and see what happens.<br><br>Gareth]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20842253</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:16:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [HELP] tunnel bandwidth aggregation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20816846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894843"><b>Manta</b></A> : Thanks for that TomS.   Sorry, the mistake eith the route pointing to Tunnel5 was just where I'd simplified some of the config to post and missed that bit - the tunnels involved in this are actually 0 and 5.  I've tried adding a "tunnel key 0" to each of the tunnel 0's - they're the same number at each end for simplicity - and a "tunnel key 5" to each of the tunnel 5's.  It doesn't seem to have made noticable difference though.<br><br>The gre traffic gets wrapped in IPSec before they go out but I wouldn't have thought that would make a difference....would it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20816846</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:55:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [HELP] tunnel bandwidth aggregation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20815327</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/660498"><b>TomS_</b></A> : Well for one, your two routes point to Tunnel 0 and 5, but you have configured Tunnel 0 and 1.<br><br>And secondly, since you have two tunnels going to the same router, you will probably need to differentiate the two through the use of the "tunnel key" command.<br><br>See how it goes once youve fixed those two bits up. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20815327</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:54:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[HELP] tunnel bandwidth aggregation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20806249</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894843"><b>Manta</b></A> : Can anyone point me in the right direction to aggregate bandwidth please?  I have the following situation between two sites:<br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>877--adsl---INET--adsl--837--871&#012;                \-sdsl--878--/&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->The ADSL links are 8Mbps/832kbps and the SDSL is 2Mbps.   I have configured two tunnel interfaces that run from the 877 to the 871 and run within IPSec.   I need to max out the bandwidth available from the 871 to the 877 so I can do a nightly off-site backup.   Currently I've tried adding " ip load-sharing per-packet" to each tunnel interface and setting a two static routes with the same metric over each tunnel.  I'm a bit confused as to why there is very little gain in speed though.   Over just the SDSL tunnel I get about 100kb/s (the line is in use for other things) and over just the ADSL I get 60kb/s.   When I combine them I get 70kb/s.....and that's what confuses me.<br><br>These are the relevant portions of config.   The SDSL line is in use for 'more important things' than the backup so I'd like to primarily use the ADSL and just use say 1Mbps of the SDSL's upstream bandwidth to boost the bandwidth - it's a backup so almost all the traffic is going one way.  Because it's equal load-balancing at the moment I'd have thought this would give me an effective bandwidth of about 1600kbps/800kbps....but it just doesn't seem to give me much more than just the adsl line alone.<br><br>Many thanks for any pointers you can give me.<br><br>Gareth<br> <br><textarea name="code" class="text" cols=50 rows=10>ip cef&#012; &#012;interface Tunnel0&#012; description Tunnel to office via ADSL&#012; bandwidth 800&#012; ip unnumbered Loopback0&#012; ip load-sharing per-packet&#012; ip virtual-reassembly&#012; qos pre-classify&#012; keepalive 3 3&#012; tunnel source Loopback0&#012; tunnel destination 192.168.1.2&#012; tunnel bandwidth transmit 800&#012;!&#012;interface Tunnel1&#012; description Tunnel to Office via SDSL&#012; bandwidth 800&#012; bandwidth receive 1024&#012; ip unnumbered Loopback5&#012; ip load-sharing per-packet&#012; ip virtual-reassembly&#012; qos pre-classify&#012; keepalive 3 3&#012; tunnel source Loopback5&#012; tunnel destination 192.168.1.6&#012; tunnel bandwidth transmit 800&#012; &#012;ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel0&#012;ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel5&#012;</textarea><!--end code block-->]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20806249</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:23:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
