<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Why wouldn&#x27;t WIFI be free? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20810892</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:38:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:38:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why wouldn&#x27;t WIFI be free?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20815368</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1217705"><b>McLovin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  elwoodblues <A HREF="/useremail/u/1388405"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If a coffee shop or resturant is offering wi fi, <b>why does AT&T need to get involved?</b><br> </div>Because AT&T provides the service and it costs money to provide the service. Starbucks probably gets a discount from AT&T and is not covering the full cost of providing WiFi to their customers.<br> </div>AT&T offers WiFi at no cost to Starbucks. AT&T makes profit, Starbucks gets 20% of the cut. At least thats how it used to be at B&N up here... Starbucks/AT&T took their spot down after B&N put up their own AP for free...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20815368</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:51:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why wouldn&#x27;t WIFI be free?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20811044</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  elwoodblues <A HREF="/useremail/u/1388405"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If a coffee shop or resturant is offering wi fi, <b>why does AT&T need to get involved?</b><br> </div>Because AT&T provides the service and it costs money to provide the service. Starbucks probably gets a discount from AT&T and is not covering the full cost of providing WiFi to their customers.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20811044</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:15:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why wouldn&#x27;t WIFI be free?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20810892</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1388405"><b>elwoodblues</b></A> : If a coffee shop or resturant is offering wi fi, why does AT&T need to get involved?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20810892</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:44:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
