Jeffrey
too dark too early
Premium
join:2002-12-24
Dix Hills,NY
clubs:
 ·Optimum Online
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Vonage
·magicjack.com
| reply to jwersan
Re: WHAT?
said by jwersan  :Well, without going into details..  I have had a few "Adult" newsgroups disappear, that held IMHO legal to view images. (NOT KIDDIE PORN, or anything like it!!!)  Ah well. I left Giganews a few years ago for other sneaky business tactics, so I'm not really surprised they did this.
--
"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin
[my ramblings] |
|
jwersan
R.I.P. Mom, Brian, Ziggy, and Max.
Premium
join:2004-12-20
Port Jefferson Station, NY
clubs:
·Optimum Online
1 edit | reply to Jeffrey
said by Jeffrey :said by jwersan :said by Jeffrey :How long before third-party news providers are forced/coerced to limit newsgroups? Giganews appears to have already started to do this.. (Though QUIETLY) Wow. I have Newshosting, but I haven't heard any talk (or seen anything) that would lead me to believe they're doing it, or about to do it. Well, without going into details..
I have had a few "Adult" newsgroups disappear, that held IMHO legal to view images. (NOT KIDDIE PORN, or anything like it!!!)
There have been several other groups that have disappeared too, with "nudist" in the name, so you can draw your own conclusions... 
By disapeared, I mean that you get an error message that the newsgroup is not available when you try to get new headers..
--
RIAA/MPAA... Bite me!!!!
In constant search for intelligent life on Earth! |
|
Jeffrey
too dark too early
Premium
join:2002-12-24
Dix Hills,NY
clubs:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FIOS
·Vonage
·magicjack.com
| reply to jwersan
said by jwersan :said by Jeffrey :How long before third-party news providers are forced/coerced to limit newsgroups? Giganews appears to have already started to do this.. (Though QUIETLY) Wow.
I have Newshosting, but I haven't heard any talk (or seen anything) that would lead me to believe they're doing it, or about to do it.
--
"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin
[my ramblings] |
|
jwersan
R.I.P. Mom, Brian, Ziggy, and Max.
Premium
join:2004-12-20
Port Jefferson Station, NY
clubs:
·Optimum Online
| reply to Jeffrey
said by Jeffrey :How long before third-party news providers are forced/coerced to limit newsgroups? Giganews appears to have already started to do this.. (Though QUIETLY)
--
RIAA/MPAA... Bite me!!!!
In constant search for intelligent life on Earth! |
|
bluedyedvd
join:2007-04-15
Overland Park, KS
| reply to stomp357
said by stomp357 :said by Jeffrey
How long before third-party news providers are forced/coerced to limit newsgroups?
[/BQUOTE :Not long. Maybe a year.  I doubt that The only reason the isps caved on this is what was reported they don't make any money off their newsgroups so why fight it. They AG. knew that so he didn't go after the usenet providers. The bigger threat to newsgroups is the riaa usenet.com lawsuit. |
|
stomp357
join:2003-04-13
Lake Charles, LA
·Suddenlink
| reply to Jeffrey
said by Jeffrey
How long before third-party news providers are forced/coerced to limit newsgroups?
[/BQUOTE :Not long. Maybe a year. |
|
Jeffrey
too dark too early
Premium
join:2002-12-24
Dix Hills,NY
clubs:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FIOS
·Vonage
·magicjack.com
| reply to TOPDAWG
said by TOPDAWG :I think it's more of a favor to the RIAA and MPAA myself. That may very well be the case, ("save the children" argument turned into copyright protection/enforcement for the RIAA and MPAA), however, the issue here becomes censorship, enforcement, and relative control of a resource.
The subscribers of those ISPs that recently (or somewhat recently in AOLs case) had their alt.binaries.* hierarchy removed now either can go to a 3rd party service, or less likely, select another broadband provider in their area.
The question now becomes what is next? I'm not advocating the use of Usenet for anything illegal, but a sweeping removal of the entire alt.binaries.* groups removes good and bad. Using a rocket to kill a mosquito, if I may loosely borrow that philosophy for a second.
So, what's the next bunch of groups to go? Rec.music.*? Alt.politics.*?
Pop open your news reader and filter the alt.binaries.* hierarchy and see just exactly how many valid, legal groups are now restricted. Granted, they may be in the minority if you want to take all of the sex groups out of the argument, but none the less, they are there.
How long before third-party news providers are forced/coerced to limit newsgroups?
--
And so castles made of sand, slip into the sea, eventually.
"Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy." - George Carlin
blog |
|
