Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verse » Switching VDSL connection from Coax to RJ11
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
328
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[help] Cant get to Craigslist but, »
« [NEWS] AT&T's Latest VRAD Headache: Grafitti  
AuthorAll Replies


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


2 edits
Switching VDSL connection from Coax to RJ11

The U-verse tech replaced my NID, and installed a new "filter" that has coaxial output. He ran coax from there to the RG (it's maybe 2 feet away, right on the other side of the wall, so distance or wiring quality is not an issue).

In my setup, the TV works fine, but the IPTV funneling through my D-link DGL4300 seems to overload the wifi portion of it. So I wanted to try using HomePNA to it with the coax line instead.

Whoops, the coax line is in use by the VDSL. I presume to use HomePNA your VDSL needs to be connected on the RJ11 side. Is that true? Or is there some sort of splitter you're supposed to use (which can't be a good thing for the VDSL signal...).

OK, so I tried making that connection to the "unfiltered" test jack with the included green CAT3 "Data" cable. RG doesn't sync that way. I tried completely disconnecting the bauln so I'm left with a perfectly typical incoming line->protector->test jack setup and it still does not connnect.

How does the NID need to be configured to make a "straight" VDSL connection? I have no POTS so that is not an issue.

--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.


gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast

First of all that is bad on the techs part. The connection from the NID to RG should have been done with Cat3 or Cat5e.

Someone should be able to answer it. If you don't want to do it call support up and they should be able to get a tech today or tomorrow.


wayjac
Premium,MVM
join:2001-12-22
Indy
reply to djrobx
Some where in the 3800 gui there is a page with a "DSL Line Selection" drop down box, have you tried that?


gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:
reply to djrobx
This would be the link for what wayjac is talking about.

»192.168.1.254/xslt?PAGE=J05&THIS···PAGE=J05


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

I figured it all out, I guess the test jack isn't connected to anything on the telco side. I connected the line to where the bauln was connected to, and it syncs up. Max capacity went from 42mbps to 49mbps.

That's impressive. I'm pretty far from the VRAD at about 2700 feet, measured in driving distance.

That freed up the coax line for HPNA, which works, and now my other wifi router isn't going crazy. Much much better.

-- Rob
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.


gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:

1 edit
Good to hear. I am about 2069' from the VRAD distance (get about 62-65mbps) wise, measured to the NID. You are correct test jack does nothing at the NID.

That is bad that the tech hooked you up via coax.


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

quote:
That is bad that the tech hooked you up via coax.
Yeah especially since he knew there was absolutely no need to. Running the CAT5 phone cord would have been just as easy. He instead passed a 6 foot coax cord through the wall and hooked it up to the RG!

I'm probably now missing the POTS filter you're supposed to use in this configuration, but since I don't have POTS it hopefully won't matter.

--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.


gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast


2 edits
Here you go courtsey of Koolkid »s157.photobucket.com/albums/t60/···0020.jpg take a look if you don't have this. Then call back to support and they can get a tech out to you.

koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY
clubs:
·Bresnan Online


3 edits
reply to djrobx
said by djrobx See Profile :

...but the IPTV funneling through my D-link DGL4300 seems to overload the wifi portion of it. So I wanted to try using HomePNA to it with the coax line instead.
That is your problem right there. Your DGL is not designed to handle the IGMPv3 messages being sent, nor can it do multicast filtering along with the IGMPv3 snooping the RG can do. Make sure your STBs are plugged directly into the RG and your problem should be fixed.

said by djrobx See Profile :

Whoops, the coax line is in use by the VDSL. I presume to use HomePNA your VDSL needs to be connected on the RJ11 side. Is that true? Or is there some sort of splitter you're supposed to use (which can't be a good thing for the VDSL signal...).
HPNA would fix your problem because the STBs would be plugged into the RG. It would have the same effect as taking the Cat5 cables from your DGL and moving them to the switch on the RG. You can have both VDSL and HPNA running on your coax line, you would need a diplexer though to do it.


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

Yup. I'm using the DGL as Gigabit Switch+Access point by disabling DHCP. I'm not using the router features of it (WAN port is unconnected). Whenever you'd play something on the DVR, all of the ethernet lights would go nuts.

But I think its "router" function still saw all of the multicast stuff occurring outside of the local subnet, and it might have trying to route or firewall some of it. There were entries in its log about "spoof IP attacks".

Ultimately I came to that same conclusion as you - a direct connection to the RG would be better. Had the tech not used up the coax port for the DSL, it would have a snap since the cable box used to use the coax there, and the other end of that coax is at the RG!
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.

koolkid1563
Premium,MVM
join:2005-11-06
Powell, WY
clubs:
·Bresnan Online

However, the HPNA interface is bridged with the Ethernet switch. So if it works putting them on the HPNA interface, then it should also work putting them on the Ethernet switch.

So, if your DVR was on the switch built into the RG, things behind the DGL still saw the activity?


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

The RG is at one end of the house (where all the wiring comes together). There is also a 5 port Gig-E switch there. The Gig-E switch goes to all the rooms in the house. In the livingroom, there's the DGL-4300. The DGL acts as a Gig-e switch for the computer (which is why I need Gig-E there), XBox 360, and PS2, and provides wifi access in the livingroom.

The U-verse tech assumed it would be OK to just plug the ethernet in there. It worked fine, but caused all of the DVR traffic to go to every machine in the network because of the lack of igmp and filtering intelligence you mentioned.

I just wasn't sure if the RG was smart enough to stop broadcasting everything to other ports on its network if I used the HPNA. It is, so now everything is happy again.
-
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verse[help] Cant get to Craigslist but, »
« [NEWS] AT&T's Latest VRAD Headache: Grafitti  


Thursday, 03-Dec 13:42:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [125] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [80] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [70] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [63] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [43] Cable Industry's 'Adoption Plus': Altruism Or PR Stunt?
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· Official Mal'Ganis Thread [World of Warcraft]