Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP » LNP Turbo Mode
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Hope the rule approved soon  
AuthorAll Replies

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
reply to NY Tel
Re: LNP Turbo Mode

As long as it applies to VoIP as well as landline, I am fine with it. I have read a few horror stories about VoIP delaying porting on the various forums.


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

said by Austinloop See Profile :

As long as it applies to VoIP as well as landline, I am fine with it. I have read a few horror stories about VoIP delaying porting on the various forums.
VoIP LNP is a different ball of wax from your local telco or cableco. You actually have to wait for two companies to process and release the number for the phone number - your VoIP carrier and then the carrier from which they purchase voice transport. So the expectation that a VoIP port away should be as quick as a traditional POTS port away is problematic.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

I am sure with the right motivation the companies involved with LNP in the VoIP arena could process the request in about 96 hours (twice that of the telco), since there are two companies involved. By the right motivation, I mean fines. If it is good for the goose, it should be just as good for the gander.

AVonGauss
Premium,MVM
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL
reply to NetAdmin
No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

said by AVonGauss See Profile :

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.
With normal port requests with say Verizon or ATT, you only have to deal with a single party. With a VoIP port request, you have to deal with two parties - the VoIP provider and their upstream provider. So, despite what you believe, it is different.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

reply to Austinloop
VoIP is not even close to being regulated the same way as traditional POTS service, for good reasons, so the FCC would first have to put them on the same regulatory playing field as Verizon and ATT. And that isn't very likely.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
And that is a real shame.


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

said by Austinloop See Profile :

And that is a real shame.
No, it is a good thing. POTS and VOIP service, as they are now, are two vastly different types services. Some of the regulatory requirements placed on POTS are impossible to deliver with VOIP.

I would urge you to first understand why they are regulated differently before you blindly state that it "is a real shame" they are regulated differently.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...


porting xpert

@spcsdns.net

reply to NetAdmin
How is a VoIP provider's upstream in anyway involved in the porting process?

Granted, if the company didn't have their own switch and simply resold services, that's one thing. As long as the switch has its own LRN, porting can happen between the VoIP provider and the winning carrier.

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
reply to NetAdmin
I had suggested, above, that VoIP ports be given 96 hours, instead of the 48 hours that a telco is given, since there are two parties involved.

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
reply to NetAdmin
What requirements, precisely, placed on pots are impossible to deliver?

I have seen ads for one of the VoIP companies saying they are your internet phone company. How are they different if they claim to provide phone service?


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

said by Austinloop See Profile :

What requirements, precisely, placed on pots are impossible to deliver?
The obvious one - guaranteed uptime.

said by Austinloop See Profile :

I have seen ads for one of the VoIP companies saying they are your internet phone company. How are they different if they claim to provide phone service?
They are a phone company, they provide you with a voice line. that you can use to talk to others on the POTS network.

Phone service comes in different flavors and VoIP is one of several different flavors of phone service. Other phone companies provide you with phone service, but are exempt from the same rules as POTS providers - cell carriers, satellite phone careers, etc.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

Well, unfortunately, if some none technical type older person decides to swallow all that the company I referring to doesn't know that there is no guaranteed up time, possible delays with emergency calls, etc., then maybe, just maybe, the rules should be the same.

But I am sure that the VoIP companies fully explain the downside of their service, including no guaranteed up time fully to new customers.

To the vast majority of people, present forum excepted, phone service is phone service.

nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
You mean, the same non-technical older person who's never upgraded from dialup? the one who can't use VoIP anyway because they don't have a broadband connection?

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
No, someone who has a broadband connection. I know some folks that have broadband connections who are totally lost on the technical end of things.

jester121

join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk

reply to Austinloop
VOIP companies are proud of saying how advanced their technology is -- the entire industry was built on being nimble and adaptive.

Time to put up or shut down. 48 hours is plenty of time to make a change whether it's an ILEC or CLEC or wholesale provider.


supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com


1 edit
reply to NetAdmin
said by NetAdmin See Profile :

said by AVonGauss See Profile :

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.
With normal port requests with say Verizon or ATT, you only have to deal with a single party. With a VoIP port request, you have to deal with two parties - the VoIP provider and their upstream provider. So, despite what you believe, it is different.
Umm, Bellsouth took over 2 weeks to port a number to Cox. I'd call that ridiculous since cell companies can do it 24 hrs.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl
-
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP« Hope the rule approved soon  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 22:25:56 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Moto Sold About 100,000 Droids
· [94] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [86] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [67] Government Will Release Some Telco Wiretap Lobbying Documents
· [61] Verizon's Hanging Up On Rural America
· [47] Verizon's Higher ETFs Annoy Senator
· [34] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [30] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [21] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· [Rant] windows 7 is the most retarded os ever and its broke to [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· House inspector failed to find major gas leak [Home Repair & Improvement]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Massive Slowdowns? [cover,1584]
· Water heater pilot light won't light [Home Repair & Improvement]
· I miss trash... [World of Warcraft]