republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP » LNP Turbo Mode
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Hope the rule approved soon  
AuthorAll Replies
-

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
reply to nitzan
Re: LNP Turbo Mode

No, someone who has a broadband connection. I know some folks that have broadband connections who are totally lost on the technical end of things.

nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
reply to Austinloop
You mean, the same non-technical older person who's never upgraded from dialup? the one who can't use VoIP anyway because they don't have a broadband connection?

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

reply to NetAdmin
Well, unfortunately, if some none technical type older person decides to swallow all that the company I referring to doesn't know that there is no guaranteed up time, possible delays with emergency calls, etc., then maybe, just maybe, the rules should be the same.

But I am sure that the VoIP companies fully explain the downside of their service, including no guaranteed up time fully to new customers.

To the vast majority of people, present forum excepted, phone service is phone service.


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

reply to Austinloop
said by Austinloop See Profile :

What requirements, precisely, placed on pots are impossible to deliver?
The obvious one - guaranteed uptime.

said by Austinloop See Profile :

I have seen ads for one of the VoIP companies saying they are your internet phone company. How are they different if they claim to provide phone service?
They are a phone company, they provide you with a voice line. that you can use to talk to others on the POTS network.

Phone service comes in different flavors and VoIP is one of several different flavors of phone service. Other phone companies provide you with phone service, but are exempt from the same rules as POTS providers - cell carriers, satellite phone careers, etc.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
reply to NetAdmin
What requirements, precisely, placed on pots are impossible to deliver?

I have seen ads for one of the VoIP companies saying they are your internet phone company. How are they different if they claim to provide phone service?


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

reply to Austinloop
said by Austinloop See Profile :

And that is a real shame.
No, it is a good thing. POTS and VOIP service, as they are now, are two vastly different types services. Some of the regulatory requirements placed on POTS are impossible to deliver with VOIP.

I would urge you to first understand why they are regulated differently before you blindly state that it "is a real shame" they are regulated differently.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX
reply to NetAdmin
And that is a real shame.


NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

reply to Austinloop
VoIP is not even close to being regulated the same way as traditional POTS service, for good reasons, so the FCC would first have to put them on the same regulatory playing field as Verizon and ATT. And that isn't very likely.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...

Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

reply to NetAdmin
I am sure with the right motivation the companies involved with LNP in the VoIP arena could process the request in about 96 hours (twice that of the telco), since there are two companies involved. By the right motivation, I mean fines. If it is good for the goose, it should be just as good for the gander.
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP« Hope the rule approved soon  


Thursday, 03-Dec 09:45:08 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [104] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [101] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [80] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [63] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [41] Cable Industry's 'Adoption Plus': Altruism Or PR Stunt?
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Working in a Stairwell and Surrounding High Walls [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· outdoor to indoor conduit power run [Home Repair & Improvement]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]