republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP » LNP Turbo Mode
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Hope the rule approved soon  
AVonGauss
Premium,MVM
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL

Re: LNP Turbo Mode

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.

NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

Re: LNP Turbo Mode

said by AVonGauss See Profile :

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.
With normal port requests with say Verizon or ATT, you only have to deal with a single party. With a VoIP port request, you have to deal with two parties - the VoIP provider and their upstream provider. So, despite what you believe, it is different.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...
Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

Re: LNP Turbo Mode

I had suggested, above, that VoIP ports be given 96 hours, instead of the 48 hours that a telco is given, since there are two parties involved.

porting xpert

@spcsdns.net

How is a VoIP provider's upstream in anyway involved in the porting process?

Granted, if the company didn't have their own switch and simply resold services, that's one thing. As long as the switch has its own LRN, porting can happen between the VoIP provider and the winning carrier.

supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com


1 edit
said by NetAdmin See Profile :

said by AVonGauss See Profile :

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.
With normal port requests with say Verizon or ATT, you only have to deal with a single party. With a VoIP port request, you have to deal with two parties - the VoIP provider and their upstream provider. So, despite what you believe, it is different.
Umm, Bellsouth took over 2 weeks to port a number to Cox. I'd call that ridiculous since cell companies can do it 24 hrs.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP« Hope the rule approved soon  


Friday, 04-Dec 20:29:47 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [82] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents [Canadian Chat]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]
· Corrupted downloads on new system [Microsoft Help]
· An Excellent Guide About Google Voice And Sip Sorcery [VOIP Tech Chat]