republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP » LNP Turbo Mode
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Hope the rule approved soon  

NetAdmin
CCNA

join:2008-05-22

Re: LNP Turbo Mode

said by AVonGauss See Profile :

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.
With normal port requests with say Verizon or ATT, you only have to deal with a single party. With a VoIP port request, you have to deal with two parties - the VoIP provider and their upstream provider. So, despite what you believe, it is different.
--
---
Over ten plus years of carrying The Clue Bat...
Austinloop

join:2001-08-19
Austin, TX

Re: LNP Turbo Mode

I had suggested, above, that VoIP ports be given 96 hours, instead of the 48 hours that a telco is given, since there are two parties involved.

porting xpert

@spcsdns.net

How is a VoIP provider's upstream in anyway involved in the porting process?

Granted, if the company didn't have their own switch and simply resold services, that's one thing. As long as the switch has its own LRN, porting can happen between the VoIP provider and the winning carrier.

supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com


1 edit
said by NetAdmin See Profile :

said by AVonGauss See Profile :

No, its not. VoIP is no different than a traditional telco, wireless or cable provider as far as LNP is concerned and should be treated no differently.
With normal port requests with say Verizon or ATT, you only have to deal with a single party. With a VoIP port request, you have to deal with two parties - the VoIP provider and their upstream provider. So, despite what you believe, it is different.
Umm, Bellsouth took over 2 weeks to port a number to Cox. I'd call that ridiculous since cell companies can do it 24 hrs.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl
Forums » FCC May Require Telcos to Speed Up LNP« Hope the rule approved soon  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 07:54:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [194] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [52] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [21] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· buffs, nerfs, and 3.3 [World of Warcraft]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Tomato/MLPPP v3 alpha 6 released! [TekSavvy]
· persistent connection to qw-in-f113.1e100.net on boot [Security]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]