Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Rogers Uses Deep Packet Inspection for DNS Redirection » DNS redirection is NOT deep packet inspection
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Injection is illegal »
« URL Manipulation  
AuthorAll Replies


drjp81

join:2006-01-09
canada
·TELUS
·TekSavvy Solutions..

reply to GOLFnSUN
Re: DNS redirection is NOT deep packet inspection

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

DNS redirection and deep packet inspection are 2 entirely different animals. DNS redirection is NOT achieved using deep packet inspection...
You totally missed it. Rogers is rederecting failed DNS requests and possibly others based on the DNS names that are passed through it's customer's HTTP requests.

Which means there is a discrimination of what service or protocol you are using for the DNS redirection. So while a ping at www.blababla.com might answer nobody's home, Rogers can hijack a HTTP request without even attempting to resolve the name.

How then can you trust the content of a website?

You go to wikipedia.org, Rogers detect via DPI the URL and domain name you are going to, and the redirect parts of the site with whatever content is commercially viable for them.

That's the plan.
--
Cheers!


GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by drjp81 See Profile :

You totally missed it. Rogers is rederecting failed DNS requests and possibly others based on the DNS names that are passed through it's customer's HTTP requests.

Which means there is a discrimination of what service or protocol you are using for the DNS redirection.{they all do that. No service is redirecting non-http(s) requests} So while a ping at www.blababla.com might answer nobody's home, Rogers can hijack a HTTP request without even attempting to resolve the name.

How then can you trust the content of a website?

You go to wikipedia.org, Rogers detect via DPI the URL and domain name you are going to, and the redirect parts of the site with whatever content is commercially viable for them.

That's the plan.
But that isn't what they are doing or even what they are being accused of. They are redirecting bad domain names to their search engine and nothing else. Saying they COULD do this or COULD do that doesn't prove anything. Any business supplying DNS services COULD do many things.

Some people don't like redirecting mistaken domain names, but that is done by almost all ISPs now and also many Toolbars - Google included. Most people like the service. For those that don't - there are DNS servers out their that will just return an error when something is mistyped or when a page has an invalid link.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

Some people don't like redirecting mistaken domain names, but that is done by almost all ISPs now
Almost "all" -- do you have a source for that truthiness?
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
Comcast: We never did anything wrong, and we'll never do it again...


GOLFnSUN
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


1 edit
said by funchords See Profile :

said by GOLFnSUN See Profile :

Some people don't like redirecting mistaken domain names, but that is done by almost all ISPs now
Almost "all" -- do you have a source for that truthiness?
BBR. Verizon, TW/RR, Cox, Embarq, Qwest, Rogers, Earthlink, Charter, Bresnan, etc. are all doing it.
»/nsearch?q=dns···vanced=1

So far, as best I could determine with search tools, AT&T & Comcast haven't started doing this yet.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
Awesome, thanks! I agree, there are some big names in there. More than I thought.
-
Forums » Rogers Uses Deep Packet Inspection for DNS RedirectionInjection is illegal »
« URL Manipulation  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 03:15:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [83] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [80] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [14] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Morning Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [5] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
Most people now reading
· Know when to run! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [SU] Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.6.2 [All Things Macintosh]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· Telus supports CRTC's NN and UBB [TekSavvy]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]