Search:  

 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery
 
Forums » Rogers Uses Deep Packet Inspection for DNS Redirection » DNS redirection is NOT deep packet inspection
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Injection is illegal »
« URL Manipulation  
AuthorAll Replies


drjp81

join:2006-01-09
canada
·TELUS
·TekSavvy Solutions..

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: DNS redirection is NOT deep packet inspection

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

DNS redirection and deep packet inspection are 2 entirely different animals. DNS redirection is NOT achieved using deep packet inspection...
You totally missed it. Rogers is rederecting failed DNS requests and possibly others based on the DNS names that are passed through it's customer's HTTP requests.

Which means there is a discrimination of what service or protocol you are using for the DNS redirection. So while a ping at www.blababla.com might answer nobody's home, Rogers can hijack a HTTP request without even attempting to resolve the name.

How then can you trust the content of a website?

You go to wikipedia.org, Rogers detect via DPI the URL and domain name you are going to, and the redirect parts of the site with whatever content is commercially viable for them.

That's the plan.
--
Cheers!


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by drjp81 See Profile :

You totally missed it. Rogers is rederecting failed DNS requests and possibly others based on the DNS names that are passed through it's customer's HTTP requests.

Which means there is a discrimination of what service or protocol you are using for the DNS redirection.{they all do that. No service is redirecting non-http(s) requests} So while a ping at www.blababla.com might answer nobody's home, Rogers can hijack a HTTP request without even attempting to resolve the name.

How then can you trust the content of a website?

You go to wikipedia.org, Rogers detect via DPI the URL and domain name you are going to, and the redirect parts of the site with whatever content is commercially viable for them.

That's the plan.
But that isn't what they are doing or even what they are being accused of. They are redirecting bad domain names to their search engine and nothing else. Saying they COULD do this or COULD do that doesn't prove anything. Any business supplying DNS services COULD do many things.

Some people don't like redirecting mistaken domain names, but that is done by almost all ISPs now and also many Toolbars - Google included. Most people like the service. For those that don't - there are DNS servers out their that will just return an error when something is mistyped or when a page has an invalid link.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Some people don't like redirecting mistaken domain names, but that is done by almost all ISPs now
Almost "all" -- do you have a source for that truthiness?
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
Comcast: We never did anything wrong, and we'll never do it again...


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


1 edit
said by funchords See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Some people don't like redirecting mistaken domain names, but that is done by almost all ISPs now
Almost "all" -- do you have a source for that truthiness?
BBR. Verizon, TW/RR, Cox, Embarq, Qwest, Rogers, Earthlink, Charter, Bresnan, etc. are all doing it.
»/nsearch?q=dns···vanced=1

So far, as best I could determine with search tools, AT&T & Comcast haven't started doing this yet.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
Awesome, thanks! I agree, there are some big names in there. More than I thought.
-
Forums » Rogers Uses Deep Packet Inspection for DNS RedirectionInjection is illegal »
« URL Manipulation  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 18:59:50 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [198] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [102] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [63] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [55] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· whole house ups [Home Repair & Improvement]
· MediacomJoel, and now Kris will be assisting you! [Mediacom]
· Heather's mouth taped shut!! [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· Will the alarms siren still work if I cancel my contract? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Forwarding previous owner's mail [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Woo hoo for snow! [Home Repair & Improvement]