<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>ISDN is the future in ISDN</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20820908</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:27:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:27:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: ISDN is the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20918215</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/177624"><b>Splitpair</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  patcat88 <A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So whatever happened to ISDN? :D<br> </div>It&#146;s very common in the business environment to find 3 BRI ISDN&#146;s being used for teleconferencing. BRI ISDN is also used extensively as a backup for the leased sub-rate data lines used by ATM machines.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.polycom.com/usa/en/home/index.html" >www.polycom.com/usa/en/home/index.html</A><br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>If you cannot fix it with a buttset and some beanies you ain't a technician.<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20918215</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ISDN is the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20918193</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/177624"><b>Splitpair</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  belushi <A HREF="/useremail/u/236961"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Virtually all decent sized comapnies use ISDN PRIs for their bigger voice trunks instead of T1s. </div>Actually the current trend is to drop the PRI&#146;s and migrate to DS1's into channel banks be they an external CB or part of the subs switch or to VoIP over DS1&#146;s DS3&#146;s or Metro-Ethernet. <br><br>Heck simply going from a PRI to a T gains one 64K as the D channel is no longer needed and that bandwidth can now be rolled into the overall pipe. <br><br>Wayne<br><small>--<br>If you cannot fix it with a buttset and some beanies you ain't a technician.<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20918193</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:39:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ISDN is the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20854804</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528480"><b>mooglebunny</b></A> : True... of course, when this Ad came out, the internet was still more of a concept and experimentation. They probably weren't even considering it for use as it is sometimes used today.<br><br>Though, I heard that digital phone line service has a great quality in using it for voice data. (I'd rather have ISDN or a T1/Partial T1 than satellite for the latency... and the fact that I wouldn't get in trouble for downloading or having multiple people view webpages at the same time. -.-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20854804</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:32:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ISDN is the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20842648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/236961"><b>belushi</b></A> : ISDN is alive and well in the United States and abroad.  Maybe not ISDN BRIs so much but ISDN PRIs are an integral part of voice/data communications. Virtually all decent sized comapnies use ISDN PRIs for their bigger voice trunks instead of T1s. ISDN is going no where and is here to stay for a while.  <br><br>Just because it isn't used in the home for Internet connectivity doesn't mean it's not widely used in other consumer spaces. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20842648</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:28:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ISDN is the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20829420</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528480"><b>mooglebunny</b></A> : Wow. It's always fun to see some of the old advertisements in old magazines. (That thing's older than I am!)<br><br>What happened? Cable was seen as a viable way to have an internet connection, as well as having the ADSL system with phone lines.<br><br>T-1 happened as well, and now there's T-3 and even more. <br><br>Isn't interesting how things change in like, a little over 20 years? xD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20829420</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:10:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>ISDN is the future</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820908</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : keywords: NYNEX New York Telephone ISDN Pathways advertisement<br><br>From Scientific American August 1986<br><br>So whatever happened to ISDN? :D<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/20820908?c=1330072&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMDgyMDkwOC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="4025778 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=801 SRC="/r0/download/1330072.thumb600~d22a19b6711af0d71ffb07659127bd30/Jul_20_001.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820908</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:25:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
