Re: shareholders in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20822169 en Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:52:51 EDT Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:52:51 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20826036 anon :
said by markopoleo See Profile :

You must never of worked in your life, most people work for free. If you work from paycheck to paycheck then you are working for free. If you miss one paycheck and are in financial problems it means each paycheck you get.. you are working for free.
I really don't know where you are coming from. Just just because you work paycheck to paycheck does not mean you are working for free. That's your own mismanagement of life causing you to work paycheck to paycheck. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20826036 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:38:56 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20826022 anon :
Since when does the president of an LLC (single member even) not pull a paycheck? The article mentions an LLC, not a fullblown corp.
That would be called a shareholder. Which then yes they can receive a paycheck. The whole point of this is the origanal poster said something along the lines of if there are no shareholders then there doesn't need to be profit. So let me repeat this simple fact. If there are no shareholders than you cannot apy yourself with a paycheck, that would be illegal. Therefore you would be working for free.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20826022 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:38:41 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20824284 pooker314 : Non-profits have "profits" very frequently. If they didn't, they typically wouldn't survive. However, that profit (usually called "operating margin" to avoid confusion), cannot be distributed to the corporation's members (sort of like shareholders). Instead, the money must be used for tax exempt purposes. This usually involves plowing it back into the business somehow (including capital development, higher salaries, etc.).

In the for-profit world, certain smaller corporations (s corps) can get into very big trouble with the IRS if they retain all of their profits for shareholder distributions in lieu of paying their owner/employees a reasonable salary (because shareholder distributions can avoid employment taxes like FICA/FUTA).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20824284 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:23:19 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20823156 markopoleo : You must never of worked in your life, most people work for free. If you work from paycheck to paycheck then you are working for free. If you miss one paycheck and are in financial problems it means each paycheck you get.. you are working for free.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20823156 Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:23:15 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20822169 tp0d :
said by captain456 :

said by tp0d See Profile :

How does no profit == work for free?
Are you serious? lets keep this simple. You open a business. You are making $100 per month worth of sales and your monthly expenses are exactly $100. You break even. You keep doing this month after month breaking even. You are basically working for free. Why is that hard to comprehend? And if you think it isn't the same when It is an evil corporation or someone else then you clearely don't understand the most basic high school level economics/finance/money/how the world works
You're using the wrong definition of 'break even'. Monthly expenses of keeping a business running -include- employees. The president of a 1-man business is -still- an employee. Even a non-profit has to have a payroll, but theyre not allowed to turn a profit. If a business can't be run without its employee or employees making a decent living, much less any profit, its not worth it.

Since when does the president of an LLC (single member even) not pull a paycheck? The article mentions an LLC, not a fullblown corp.

Yes I understand economics, I think you are lacking in some of the principals tho..

-j
--
if it aint broke, tweak it!!
currently on FiOS (kick aZZ!)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20822169 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:50:36 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821411 anon :
said by EPS See Profile :

It depends on how the corporation is set up, I suppose. And I think the term "shareholder" is being used very loosely here to imply being publicly traded, though I could be wrong.
If it's a corporation then theres at least 1 shareholder. And not it does not have to be publically traded. If there are no shareholders than it is not a corporation. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821411 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:51:52 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821370 EPS : It depends on how the corporation is set up, I suppose. And I think the term "shareholder" is being used very loosely here to imply being publicly traded, though I could be wrong.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821370 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:41:41 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821349 anon :
said by EPS See Profile :

Expenses include paychecks- you can have "no profits" if paying your salary wipes out your profit margin.
Umm you can't pay yourself salary. I'm sorry but you guys are ridiculously uneducated on the subject of business yet you love to throw out your uneducated opinions. If there are no shareholders than you cannot pay yourself a salary, that would be illegal since you cannot enter into a contract with yourself. If you are legally allowed to pay yourself a salary then that means there are shareholders. So your statement is null. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821349 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:35:18 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821254 EPS : Expenses include paychecks- you can have "no profits" if paying your salary wipes out your profit margin.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821254 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:07:29 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821158 anon :
said by tp0d See Profile :

How does no profit == work for free?
Are you serious? lets keep this simple. You open a business. You are making $100 per month worth of sales and your monthly expenses are exactly $100. You break even. You keep doing this month after month breaking even. You are basically working for free. Why is that hard to comprehend? And if you think it isn't the same when It is an evil corporation or someone else then you clearely don't understand the most basic high school level economics/finance/money/how the world works]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20821158 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:34:58 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820681 jc100 : Well I broke it down on a monthly scale anyway. You can multiple that x 12 ONLY if it's assumed to be a constant. Either way, I think they will do OK.

P.S. I did type year instead of month. OOPS. Corrected.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820681 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:21:09 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820286 anon : check your math, customers pay every month. $1.4 million that sounds much better]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820286 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:39:19 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820438 jc100 : That's what bankruptcy and an LLC is for. If you file bankruptcy then they can only settle with what you have left. Furthermore, if you are an LLC, they can only sue the company and not you. Presto.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820438 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:19:19 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820297 S_engineer : They need to leave 20k around just in case they need to close. Closing a business is very expensive too!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820297 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:35:21 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820263 jc100 : Well all start ups are a financial loss. There are few companies that open their doors and hit the ground running into the black. It just takes time to build a customer base, market, etc. However, this company has the right idea. Right now, 150 isn't a lot but if they can expand, then I am sure they can make a good deal of money. If your service is say 40 dollars a month and you can net even 3,000 customers, thats 120,000 a *Month*. Figuring this is a small few man operation, then that isn't bad. Consider maybe 20,000 for taxes. 100,000 left. 4 Employees (20K each salary monthly if all are partners and even split). Then around 20K left for future investments (monthly). It's feasible if they can build their subscriber base anyway. The monthly assumes a constant.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820263 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:27:09 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820253 tp0d : How does no profit == work for free?

Profit happens when there is excess money after paying ALL the bills, including your paycheck. Breaking even with no profit still pays employees.

Sprint, being a publicly held company, has shareholders that demand some kind of ROI for their services. Since it was said they weren't losing money, the profit margin just wasnt enough.

damn anon's

-j]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820253 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:24:33 EDT Re: shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820245 anon :
said by patcat88 See Profile :

If you have no shareholders, you don't need profit, just breaking even. :D
Are you willing to work for free? I didn't think so, so why would you expect somebody else to? Not only work for free but take on massive amounts of debt just for the ability to work for free?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820245 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:20:55 EDT shareholders http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820196 patcat88 : If you have no shareholders, you don't need profit, just breaking even. :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20820196 Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:08:00 EDT