site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
96
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
kudos:16

Not going to happen.

BitTorrents advantages pretty much all disappear when dealing with live streams; you then become limited to the average upstream capacity in the network. In Ontario/Quebec, that'd be about half a megabit, which may or may not be barely enough for acceptable SD quality.

All the problems, however, disappear if you switch to IPv6. IPv6 makes multicast a required part of the spec, and so I'd expect that it'd be supported by pretty much any ISP that provided native IPv6 connectivity.

So, instead of spending $22 million on this research, I think they'd have been better off spending the money on encouraging IPv6 adoption. As soon as you have widespread access to multicast, you can do television broadcasting almost trivially.


espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Clear Wireless

said by Guspaz:

All the problems, however, disappear if you switch to IPv6. IPv6 makes multicast a required part of the spec, and so I'd expect that it'd be supported by pretty much any ISP that provided native IPv6 connectivity.
Multicast is a required part of the IPv4 spec as well. Just because the feature is part of the spec doesn't mean you need to implement it (think QoS/ToS). I expect Internet adoption of multicast in v6 to be about as widespread as v4. (ie, nonexistent)

Thursday, 31-May 00:36:00 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics