<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Why can&#x27;t just give out gateways that do NAT and have a ipv6 in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20827905</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:57:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:57:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Why can&#x27;t just give out gateways that do NAT and have a ipv6</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20827905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/844746"><b>Joe12345678</b></A> : Why can't just give out gateways that do NAT and have a ipv6 on the out side?<br><br>Or they are likely want to make things so bad that people will pay pay $5 per pc just to get there own ipv6 ip's. This nat nat system will bad for may things on line but will also kill off bit torrent and some p2p stuff.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20827905</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:10:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
