<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Curious... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20830866</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:01:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:01:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20838260</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/646423"><b>Ian</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  GOLFnSUN <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So the last 2 years they actually had to borrow money to fund improvements. Sure doesn't sound like a money grubbing operation to me. But I am sure it does to those who think they should get everything for free and other people should invest and not get a return(except for themselves of course).<br> </div>A company needing to borrow money, particularly a young one, to fund improvements is hardly unusual.  And making 10-15% <b>NET</b> profit, even after paying interest on that debt is financial performance to envy.<br><br>Which is not to say that I'd buy Embarq stock.  Their entire sleazy business model is under a microscope now.  That enviable revenue figure could plummet by 50% or more in short order should they be required to need an opt in and the debt would soon bankrupt them.<br><small>--<br>&#147;Any claim that the root of a problem is simple should be treated the same as a claim that the root of a problem is Bigfoot.  Simplicity and Bigfoot are found in the real world with about the same frequency.&#148; &#150; David Wong</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20838260</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:27:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20834767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/340409"><b>funchords</b></A> : That's a big part of it, but remember that NebuAd did not just passively monitor, it also used exploits to force-load its cookies.  <br><br>And while privacy is a big concern, there is a resulting and real chilling effect that affects the future of the internet.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20834767</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:06:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20832206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/372937"><b>Dezbend</b></A> : That is the answer I was expecting, and that is basically the answer I would give... so the issue isn't really about money-grubbing (via finding new revenue streams) but indeed privacy.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/pubgames">DSLr Mafia Member</a>.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20832206</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:51:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20832109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/340409"><b>funchords</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Dezbend <A HREF="/useremail/u/372937"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Just out of curiosity (and I don't want to put myself in the position of defending this) is it ok for Embarq to put a google search bar on the myembarq.com home page (they get revenue from google everytime someone uses that search option)?</div>Good question! <br><br>I think it's okay because myembarq.com is not synonymous with Internet service, it's a value-added and alternative service.  You never "have" to use it.  It's just like embarqmail, and why you put up with their decisions on spam filtering even if they're aren't always good decisions.  It's okay because you have other options and aren't locked in to their email service.<br><small>--<br>Robb Topolski -= <A HREF="http://funchords.com/">funchords.com</a> =- Hillsboro, Oregon<br><i>Comcast: <A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5pv5zu">We never did anything wrong, and we'll never do it again</a></i>... <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20832109</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:35:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20832049</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/372937"><b>Dezbend</b></A> : Just out of curiosity (and I don't want to put myself in the position of defending this) is it ok for Embarq to put a google search bar on the myembarq.com home page (they get revenue from google everytime someone uses that search option)?<br><br>If so how is that different?<br><br>If not why?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/pubgames">DSLr Mafia Member</a>.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20832049</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:24:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831467</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1447722"><b>supergirl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  GOLFnSUN <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  MASantangelo <A HREF="/useremail/u/1043672"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do if I were a money-grubbing ISP.<br> </div>Check out their income statements:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=EQ&annual" >finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=EQ&annual</A><br>They are only making 14%, 12.3%, & 10.6% the last 3 years. Just enough to keep investors interested enough in their company to fund capital improvements.<br><br>Income last 3 years <br>683,000,000  &#9;784,000,000  &#9;878,000,000<br><br>Capital expenditures last 3 years<br>829,000,000&#9;923,000,000&#9;828,000,000<br><br>So the last 2 years they actually had to borrow money to fund improvements. <br> </div>You forget cash flow, which funds infrastructure (pays all the bills then some is great cash flow). The OCF is $1.74 billion. Their EBITA is $2.67 billion. Their operating margin is nearly 26%. I'd say Emarq has become a nice little investment. The only have $5.67 billion in debt as well. Cash Flow is always a key number. Their book value is $29.98 billion. And, their dividend number would make some companies drool.<br><small>--<br>Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.<br>-Supergirl</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831467</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:51:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831376</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/567879"><b>Kearnstd</b></A> : when they make their profits off selling a product that is one thing,  when they make profits off selling out their customers that is money grubbing.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831376</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:37:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831322</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>GOLFnSUN</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  funchords <A HREF="/useremail/u/340409"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Also, Investors don't fund capital improvements.  Investors authorize the seeking of new funding or fire boards of directors.  <br> </div>Of course they do. Thru new stock offerings and reinvestment of money that could have gone for bigger dividends is reinvesting by the shareholders. Borrowing is mostly used to fund improvements, but that isn't the only way.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831322</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:28:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/340409"><b>funchords</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  GOLFnSUN <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  MASantangelo <A HREF="/useremail/u/1043672"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do if I were a money-grubbing ISP.<br> </div>Ah, the demand that ISPs don't make a reasonable profit. Of course, to some, any company that actually makes money is by definition "money grubbing". </div>When I pay them to ship my bits across the Internet, and they betray my best interests by reselling my data to a third party, that's money-grubbing. <br><div class="bquote">Check out their income statements:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=EQ&annual" >finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=EQ&annual</A><br>They are only making 14%, 12.3%, & 10.6% the last 3 years. Just enough to keep investors interested enough in their company to fund capital improvements.</div>Only 14%, 12.3% or 10.6% -- in today's economy? -- that's pretty damned good return on investment.  <br><br>Like it or not, Broadband is a commodity.  It's not the place to invest if you want 20%+ growth.  It's slower and more assured, like a utility.<br><br>Also, Investors don't fund capital improvements.  Investors authorize the seeking of new funding or fire boards of directors.  But Investors are investors because they have already invested.  What they then want to see is return on their investment either in increased stock prices or dividends. <br><small>--<br>Robb Topolski -= <A HREF="http://funchords.com/">funchords.com</a> =- Hillsboro, Oregon<br><i>Comcast: <A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/5pv5zu">We never did anything wrong, and we'll never do it again</a></i>... <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:11:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>GOLFnSUN</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  MASantangelo <A HREF="/useremail/u/1043672"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do if I were a money-grubbing ISP.<br> </div>Ah, the demand that ISPs don't make a reasonable profit. Of course, to some, any company that actually makes money is by definition "money grubbing". <br><br>Check out their income statements:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=EQ&annual" >finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=EQ&annual</A><br>They are only making 14%, 12.3%, & 10.6% the last 3 years. Just enough to keep investors interested enough in their company to fund capital improvements.<br><br>Income last 3 years <br>683,000,000  &#9;784,000,000  &#9;878,000,000<br><br>Capital expenditures last 3 years<br>829,000,000&#9;923,000,000&#9;828,000,000<br><br>So the last 2 years they actually had to borrow money to fund improvements. Sure doesn't sound like a money grubbing operation to me. But I am sure it does to those who think they should get everything for free and other people should invest and not get a return(except for themselves of course).<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20831164</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Curious...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20830866</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1043672"><b>MASantangelo</b></A> : I'm curious to see if any of these ISPs raised rates/prices/fees in order to pay for NebuAD hardware/software and then proceeded to pocket the profit. <br><br>Seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do if I were a money-grubbing ISP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20830866</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:55:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
