DKS
Damn Kidney Stones
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-03-22
Owen Sound, ON
clubs:
 ·Bell Sympatico
| reply to marcbase
Re: CAIP debunks Bell Canada throttling claim
said by marcbase  :... no define designated party, because in this case, the designated party is Bell If i tell the guy from Bell to forward my hand written demand to the appropriate party then yes they have to do it "Hand written" is not something posted to an internet forum.
--
Need-based health care not greed-based health care. |
|
marcbase
join:2008-07-31
j3y-8v5 | i guess if he post it in direct forum, it would be considered official
Unless you give them only your phone number(if you do, tell them to call you to verify your indetity) |
|
root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON
1 edit | reply to DKS
AGAIN, what business is it of yours DKS when questions were put to deadpool and not you?
And this is the problem with this forum. deadpool mouths off and here we go again, a bunch of regular users that think they know everything start protecting deadpool. If they don't get their way they lock the thread on a regular basis. [edit] This is unacceptable.
Well guess what DKS? YOU'RE WRONG and I won't explain why. Deadpool according to Bell's own rules must answer FULLY. And I suggest he check with his legal department as to why.
I'm expecting his answers on his CAIP comments as well, actually many of us are.
--
Please engage eyeballs and retain functional brain before operating fingers. |
|
Deadpool
Go Sens Go
Premium,VIP
join:2001-03-29
Canada
·Bell Sympatico
1 edit | I'm actually still waiting on your PM that actually proves who you are, not just a telephone number.
Check with your lawyer and he/she will tell you that a phone number isn't sufficient to prove your identity and make a request.
As for anything relating to CAIP, I'm not going to comment on anything related to the Part VII application currently being reviewed by the CRTC. You'll of course not be satisfied with this answer. Too bad. I'll still sleep fine.
--
Disclaimer: If I express an opinion, it is my own opinion, not that of Bell or its related companies. |
|
root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON
| Let's get this clear. So you are refusing to provide customer satisfaction? And you refuse to check with your legal department and or your superiors?
--
Please engage eyeballs and retain functional brain before operating fingers. |
|
sbrook
Premium,Mod
join:2001-12-14
H0H 0H0
 ·Rogers Hi-Speed
Host:
Rogers
Bell Canada
| reply to Deadpool
root9, your questions have been asked and answers provided. Just because they aren't the answers you want to hear and your persistence on continually trying to provoke other answers is taking this thread round and round in pointless circles.
You've been given the best answer on the privacy matter that you can be given. The matter of the Part VII application is essentially "before the court" and it would be totally for deadpool to make any comments that were not authorized by Bell's legal department. And if I were in his shoes, I would want to even consider going there. So your persistence on that matter also takes this thread around in pointless circles.
Therefore this thread is locked ... not based on any desires expressed by anyone in this thread, but from the simple fact of "asked and answered". |
|
