<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>latency issues in WildBlue Satellite</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20838844</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:13:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:13:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21008779</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1445103"><b>decifal</b></A> : What kills me is the very loose definition of Rural...   IMO rural is where you can't even get cell service, dont see a neighbor if you drive one way for at least 1 minute...  If this is you.. Your rural in my book..  However... I can freaking see towers and if I walk to my driveway, I can see the neighbors..  Granted, i'm sure they are wondering wtf i'm doing looking at them, but I can see them..  I just feel like they need to rip out the copper in some places and replace with updated fiber and be done with it..  Yes not always 1000000 percent profitable, but hell man quality is also important with a buisness as well as profit.....  Least it should be....   I really do wish I had an independent Teleco company servicing my area instead of the death star..  least they tend to buildout their service areas....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21008779</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:10:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20840447</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : My son (Ranger_One) plays WoW with either WB or with Dialup depending on what he is doing. So it is not entirely impossible...just frustrating sometimes. Nothing like finding yourself in a sudden high Ping spike/lag during a battle...;)  <br><br>Dialup provides lower ping and less lag because is allows higher packets either way. But you sacrifice speed which has it's own set of problems....especially when "a venturing" with a group.  <br><br>Yeah, living in a rural area with no other options than satellite and/or dialup is a "pain".  Especially when you see so many Cellphone Wireless towers around...but Wireless Internet services are not offered to you yet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20840447</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:08:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20839922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : there is nothing I can do as far as I know.  I once tried to get a dsl service and it was just impossible.  cable is WAY out of the question so I don't think I can do anything else, but oh well.  I guess I can just suffer for now.  in another year I'll be moving anyway lol.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20839922</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:02:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20839818</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234625"><b>Island Jeff</b></A> : Here is what I get over wildblue now<br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Pinging google.com [64.233.167.99] with 32 bytes of data:<br><br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1625ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1231ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1346ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1210ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1238ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1412ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1246ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=2815ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1256ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1181ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1394ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1213ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1427ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1208ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=2588ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1220ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1283ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1283ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1185ms TTL=241<br>Reply from 64.233.167.99: bytes=32 time=1261ms TTL=241<br><br>Ping statistics for 64.233.167.99:<br>    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),<br>Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:<br>    Minimum = 1181ms, Maximum =  2815ms, Average =  1431ms<hr></blockquote><br><br>Any wireless providers anywhere near you that might be interested in expanding your way with a little help?<br><br>Any local towers that might be utilized?<br><br>Do you have any kind of local cable system that could be utilized?<br><br>Any chance your town/township could work on cell providers to expand service / services in your area?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.beaverbeacon.com/Beaver_Island_Broadband_DSL_Internet/">Very happy TDS DSL user</a> | <A HREF="http://www.beaverisland.net/Broadband_Internet">Wildblue  in Lake Michigan</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20839818</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:30:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20839151</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : so basically there is no way to make it better?  That is rather annoying.  I wish I could get something other than satellite besides dial-up >.  rural areas are no fun.  Well that stinks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20839151</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:12:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20838878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234625"><b>Island Jeff</b></A> : My believe is that as of 11/2006 wildblue made the decision to maintain advertised speeds for large file transfers at the expense of latency, so latency jumped from 600-700 to 1400+. I envision everyone's packets sitting in line in a router at the gateway waiting to squeeze into the line going over the satellite so traffic over the satellite is maximized in efficiency in terms of getting as much bandwidth as possible through the pipe.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.beaverbeacon.com/Beaver_Island_Broadband_DSL_Internet/">Very happy TDS DSL user</a> | <A HREF="http://www.beaverisland.net/Broadband_Internet">Wildblue  in Lake Michigan</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20838878</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:13:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>latency issues</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20838844</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I was wondering if latency is supposed to be THIS big of a problem.  I am trying to play World of Warcraft and my latency is often 2000ms+.  I was wondering if there was a way to fix this or if its just impossible to play WoW.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20838844</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:06:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
