| reply to oh LOOK
Re: CAIPS new Filing: CAIP debunks Bell Canada throttling claim I like what CAIP is asking for and reiterates in its filing:
=====
the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (CAIP) filed an application with the Commission (the Application), pursuant to Part VII of the CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure, seeking a number of orders declaring that Bell’s throttling of GAS services breached sections 24, 25, 27, and 36 of the Telecommunications Act (The Act) and mandating Bell to cease and desist from same, as follows:
1. A final order directing Bell Canada to cease and desist from using any technologies to “shape”, “throttle” and/or “choke” its wholesale ADSL services;
2. An order that Bell comply with the terms and conditions of its wholesale ADSL tariffs;
3. A declaration that Bell has acted unlawfully and in a manner that is contrary to tariffs approved by the Commission;
4. An order that Bell not deviate from the terms and conditions of its approved wholesale ADSL tariffs without prior Commission approval of any such changes;
5. A declaration that Bell has acted unlawfully and in a manner that is contrary to the requirement that a local exchange carrier that provides service to other local exchange carriers provide advance notice of network changes, pursuant to Local Competition, Telecom Decision CRTC 97-8 (Decision 97-8);
6. A declaration that Bell has granted to itself an undue and unreasonable preference and subjected independent ISPs to an undue and unreasonable disadvantage by shaping, throttling and choking its wholesale ADSL services in the manner described in this Application; and
7. A declaration that Bell has acted unlawfully and contrary to the prohibition against carrier interference with the content of messages carried over its telecommunications network contrary to section 36 of the Act and contrary to the Canadian telecommunications policy objectives set out in paragraphs 7(a) and (i) which, inter alia, seek to protect the privacy of persons. |
