Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast HSI » Complain about Comcast=Have your Reputation Scrutinized
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[General] web page image problem »
« 2 Modems  
AuthorAll Replies


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype


4 edits
reply to Nerdtalker
Re: Complain about Comcast=Have your Reputation Scrutinized

said by Nerdtalker See Profile :

I found this particularly unnerving:
We considered whether some form of metered usage could adequately address the problem. Metered usage would allow us to ensure that we are appropriately distributing the costs of the network usage to those who use the network most. However, metered usage has not been widely accepted in the marketplace, and, in any event, doesn’t directly address the issue of congestion in the network.
It's funny you should pick that. They've also admitted in a previous filing HERE, that Sandvine doesn't directly address the issue of congestion in the network, either.
Specifically, Comcast’s current P2P management is triggered when the number of P2P uploads in a given area for a particular P2P protocol reaches a certain, pre-determined level, regardless of the level of overall network traffic at that time, and regardless of the time of day when the applicable P2P protocol threshold is reached.
That's right!! -- Sandvine doesn't use congestion as a factor. It simply counts connections that it thinks are uploading and cuts off anything above that count, even if there is bandwidth available! It's what I had been saying all along that the level of interference didn't go up and down following probable congestion patterns (despite my obvious lack of qualifications ), but was the same level 24/7.

So, here's their defense? Given the choice of preventing congestion by ...
A. publicly organizing their business model with "metered usage" which was not widely accepted in the marketplace nor directly addressing congestion, or
B. secretly blocking uploads using packet forgery methods and also not widely accepted in the marketplace and ALSO not directly addressing congestion
... Comcast chose "B"? Not that I would want metered usage, but at least it's honest.

Our reply to that disclosure is HERE and most of the geek stuff starts on page 8.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
Comcast: We never did anything wrong, and we'll never do it again...
-
Forums » US Cable Support » Comcast » Comcast HSI[General] web page image problem »
« 2 Modems  


Sunday, 29-Nov 05:48:51 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [122] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [73] Weekend Open Thread
· [72] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· AV-Comp. Retrospective/Proactive Test 11/2009 released [Security]
· Shareport problem on DIR-655 [D-Link]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DIR-655 New Beta 1.32b09 [D-Link]
· [FREEZING] Spybost S&D Updater [Security]
· Child Porn Laws - The Traci Lords Argument [Canadian Chat]