? - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
grydlok join:2004-01-06 Richmond, VA	? Well at least they won't have to pay for upkeep.
grydlok join:2004-01-06 Richmond, VA	to forum · permalink · · 2008-07-24 09:09:47 ·
BK join:2001-09-10 Wheaton, IL	now who pays for the upgrading up the towers to WiMAX ?
BK join:2001-09-10 Wheaton, IL	to forum · permalink · · 2008-07-24 09:27:21 ·
cghh join:2001-01-15 Milpitas, CA 1 edit	said by BK : now who pays for the upgrading up the towers to WiMAX ? I think that this agreement is about the tower structures, not the antennas hanging on the towers and the base station equipment. It's this stuff that would have to upgraded to WiMax, not the tower structures. It seems that in these discussion, the distinction between "tower" and "cell site" often gets lost. Sometimes a cell site doesn't even have a tower, such as when the antennas are mounted on top of a building.
cghh join:2001-01-15 Milpitas, CA 1 edit	to forum · permalink · · 2008-07-24 12:51:16 ·


Tuesday, 10-Nov 02:34:27	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF