<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Technology advancement is great BUT in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20846812</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:54:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:54:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Technology advancement is great BUT</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20847476</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1192138"><b>LordFlux</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by wimaxxxerrr :</small><br><br>I feel sorry for cities suckered into using WiFi for a city-wide deployment.<br> </div>Agreed. Dublin, Georgia is one of those cities. The town received a $318,750 grant from GTA... the city chipped in with an additional $159,375 grant. So far, they have WiFi downtown and plan to spread it across 40% of the city by 2009. ( &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.gmanet.com/Paper.aspx?CNID=23944" >www.gmanet.com/Paper.aspx?CNID=23944</A> )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20847476</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:17:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Technology advancement is great BUT</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20847430</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jc100 <A HREF="/useremail/u/614772"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Doesn't this city read the news to see how many tens of city wifi projects have costs millions, but failed terribly?  I'm sure this will be another such case in a few years if that.<br> </div>I tend to believe that most muni efforts are a big waste of time (and I have said so many times), however this is a slightly better scenario. All the failed muni efforts have attempted to blanket hundreds (and in some cases thousands) of square miles with a wifi; a technology designed for in home use. Wimax on the other hand is meant for large, outdoor deployments and is much better suited for something like this. However, the fact that its a muni deployment might just doom it from the start, unless some real planning goes into it. <br><small>--<br><b>If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.</b><br><b>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20847430</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:09:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Technology advancement is great BUT</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846812</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Muni WiFi fails because it's a technology designed for 300' radius.  WiMAX is made for this.  I feel sorry for cities suckered into using WiFi for a city-wide deployment.  WiMAX is now ready and is the way to go.  Being new it will of course have it's challenges, but you don't move forward until someone takes the first step.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846812</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:09:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Technology advancement is great BUT</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846651</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/614772"><b>jc100</b></A> : Doesn't this city read the news to see how many tens of city wifi projects have costs millions, but failed terribly?  I'm sure this will be another such case in a few years if that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846651</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:29:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
