<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: This From AT&#x26;T in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20848140</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:52:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:52:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: This From AT&#x26;T</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20852480</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Nerdtalker <A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Perhaps instead of bickering over a merger which would bring 4G network speeds to Sprint subscribers, AT&T should get off it's collective backside and upgrade more of its network to, you know, at least 3G or something. <br> </div>I am one of the first people to criticize smaller providers for trying to sue instead of deploying their own network to stay competitive, and this is no different. If anyone had an excuse <b>not</b> to deploy, it sure <b>ISN'T</b> ATT. For a company with so many resources (money, spectrum, physical assets, etc.) its downright cowardly for ATT to behave in this manor. <br><small>--<br><b>If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.</b><br><b>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20852480</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:35:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This From AT&#x26;T</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20850745</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772729"><b>Nerdtalker</b></A> : Perhaps instead of bickering over a merger which would bring 4G network speeds to Sprint subscribers, AT&T should get off it's collective backside and upgrade more of its network to, you know, at least 3G or something. <br><br>Just a suggestion, especially considering how much this iPhone thing is getting and how poor the coverage is that people are reporting with it...<br><br>(please detect a tinge of facetiousness)<br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20850745</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:56:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This From AT&#x26;T</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20848140</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225917"><b>jtel</b></A> : I agree that AT&t views the new ClearWire as a threat.<br><br>The whining may be related to them having to divest some wireless bandwidth to ClearWire after the Bell South merger, sort of sour grapes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20848140</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:17:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This From AT&#x26;T</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20847462</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  DoRight <A HREF="/useremail/u/1471691"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Shut up AT&T.. The big boy is scared of a little company.. Oh well...<br> </div>I personally wouldnt classify a Sprint/Clearwire combo as a little company, but I agree with your point. This "double whammy" clearly poses a threat to ATT's business model, and so they are attempting to take action. My take on this would be that instead of whining about it, ATT should use some of their own spectrum and deploy their own network if they think its that big of a threat. In all honesty they dont actually need to deploy anything as they are the LEC in a good portion of the country, so they already have access to all the customers. <br><small>--<br><b>If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.</b><br><b>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20847462</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:14:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: This From AT&#x26;T</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846819</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1471691"><b>DoRight</b></A> : Shut up AT&T.. The big boy is scared of a little company.. Oh well...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846819</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:09:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This From AT&#x26;T</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846806</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/285788"><b>n2jtx</b></A> : To think that this complaint comes from AT&T, who between all the mergers, acquisitions and auctions controls more wireless spectrum than god.  Figuring their existing 850MHz and 1900MHz band holdings plus the 700MHz and AWS spectrum they have acquired, I fail to see how they can complain.<br><small>--<br>I support the right to keep and arm bears.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,20846806</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:06:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
